Viewing profile — panick21_
panick21_
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 07, 2019, 11:55 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,598
- Public activity
- 5,177 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About panick21_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49194928
Can you link me to a rack you can buy from them, I couldn't find any. Are they it conventional servers? What's the software base?
-
comment
Comment #49194918
Thanks for the Source, Brain.
-
comment
Comment #49194908
You prevent speeding by structuring the road environment so to make speeding less. Comfortable, you narrow roads, you impact the visual field, you have speed bumps, raised cross wa…
-
comment
Comment #49194822
It depends on the OS, some OS have some way to do IO that gets around that. iouring or things like that. I don't know how Hurd does IO. Most microkernals have methods to do IO in a…
-
comment
Comment #49189913
Yes, you want to do more IPC, its basically linear with the increase in performance. So the amount of overhead stays the same basically. At least in IPC benchmarks and those tend t…
-
comment
Comment #49182250
The solution is that we should give humans and waymo way less tolerance.
-
comment
Comment #49182222
If you live in car sewer then slightly better shit is considered acceptable. I prefer not to live like that.
-
comment
Comment #49182203
Capex for countries isn't really that big of a problem. You can raise lots of capital for long term, a proper investment should increase land values (or property values). Generally…
-
comment
Comment #49182141
I live in Switzerland and it actually saves money for your society. Its universally considered a fantastic investment for the country and many people are happy to pay it, both in t…
-
comment
Comment #49182120
Easiest to understand their value as a pedestrian in a place that doesn't care about pedestrian and looks at their deaths as irrelevant. We know a lot about how to improve road saf…
-
comment
Comment #49180539
If large corps see the value and build whole data-centers with oxide racks, a few large costumers alone can be huge. I suspect part of this raise has to with Antropic using Oxide a…
-
comment
Comment #49180499
I don't think that's true. Oracle just came in with clearly higher price then anybody else was willing to even consider. They could also have fired a lot of people and likely survi…
-
comment
Comment #49180483
You still need to do devops on your own infrastructure.
-
comment
Comment #49180441
IBM stuff is likely to expensive and optimized for different things. Same for the other Post-Mainframe stuff. You would pay for a lot of stuff you don't need, and there is a reason…
-
comment
Comment #49180310
They mean is that they are much harder to acquire. Their goal is to become an independent public company.
-
comment
Comment #49177755
If all you know about public transit is CA building HIGH SPEED rail then you are not worth talking about.
-
comment
Comment #49176443
> Any public dollar that gets contributed to housing ... in the US > Building housing with no parking is not feasible for 95% of deals. You simply won't get financing Because of co…
-
comment
Comment #49176134
Some of their larger costumer might want to buy them instead so it doesn't happen.
-
comment
Comment #49176126
Preempted the blog post. Man, they are just sucking up capital. If somebody like Antropic has made them the primary 'CPU' rack, then that's they kind of cash you need. I mean, you …
-
comment
Comment #49176045
Your point is so fucking pointless, meaningless and pedantic. People are not 'hung up' on it. Its just an irrelevant fucking point that has no practical meaning and you keep repeat…
-
comment
Comment #49176032
Refueling and moon mission is not primary motivation, Starlink and so on are. You would likely have called it naive to try to develop reusability in the first place. Yes its harder…
-
comment
Comment #49172919
To be fair, oil nationalization and nationalization of incredibly advanced technology companies are not the same thing. See Norway as for what's possible if you do resource nationa…
-
comment
Comment #49172855
Yeah so you just don't actually understand the economics. The thing is, unless you massively increase the volume of Falcon 9, you are not going to get it that much cheaper. Its alr…
-
comment
Comment #49165635
I think one important point to stress, is yes SpaceX advantage is reusability, but even when Falcon 9 was not reusable is was utterly dominating the market and was far cheaper then…
-
comment
Comment #49162760
Funny how people how hate Musk always reach for the 'but Gwynne Shotwell' nonsense. Gwynne Shotwell was incredibly frustrated with the aerospace industry. So frustrated that she th…