Viewing profile — palant
palant
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 07, 2016, 2:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 525
- Public activity
- 194 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About palant
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42783796
Note : I am the author of this article. Apples and oranges. Android is supposed to isolate apps from each other (yes, theory). So a malicious app should only be able to steal data …
-
comment
Comment #42001289
Note : I am the author of this article. MV3 makes it considerably harder to introduce a security vulnerability, but it doesn’t really help with outright malicious extensions. In th…
-
comment
Comment #41999430
Note : I am the author of this article. That question is answered, in the last section of the article. And: yes, they are selling it, as they admit in the privacy policy.
-
comment
Comment #41847440
As I said: “according to many credible witnesses, not all of them anonymous. Heck, some of it is even on video.”
-
comment
Comment #41846409
What is there to be gained you ask? Well, there is currently a creep in a position of power at FSF who is actively making women and other people feel unwelcome, effectively pushing…
-
comment
Comment #41845882
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #37313806
As I said, one device is enough.
-
comment
Comment #37313119
Note : I am the author of this article. They have at least one device with an unencrypted copy of their data, likely two or more. They only need this passphrase to set up sync. If …
-
comment
Comment #37313082
Note : I am the author of this article. Yes, they will probably ask Facebook then. Or check your web search history. There is more than one source for them to draw from. But you ca…
-
comment
Comment #37312995
Note : I am the author of this article. Firefox Sync encrypts all data on the client side before sending it. Chrome Sync can do the same if you know which settings to use. 1Passwor…
-
comment
Comment #37312890
Funny thing is: declarative access to websites still allows for plenty of mischief if one wanted to do it. I’ve actually seen malicious extensions abuse that. Browsers might have t…
-
comment
Comment #37312822
Note : I am the author of this article. Yes, they fixed this particular issue (and a few more), the article mentions it. But the update I published today explains why Chrome Sync i…
-
comment
Comment #37312475
Note : I am the author of this article. Every ad blocker gets full and complete access to all your data. It needs that kind of access in order to … tada … remove ads. It’s really s…
-
comment
Comment #37311908
Note : I am the author of this article. They fixed this particular issue (and a few more), the article mentions it. But the update I published today explains why Chrome Sync is sti…
-
comment
Comment #36244134
Note : I’m the author of this article. I’m fairly certain that these users didn’t leave it at reviews. There is a “Report abuse” form which one can use and which was certainly used…
-
comment
Comment #36244069
It wasn’t really intended. I originally looked at ad blockers since I know that most of them are shady, that’s how I immediately found the PCVARK ad blockers. I stumbled upon these…
-
comment
Comment #36241592
Note : I am the author of this article. Yes, Chrome uses Safe Browsing to flag malicious extensions. But they seem to use it very sparingly for some reason.
-
comment
Comment #36241558
Note : I am the author of this article. Yes, Mozilla doesn’t publish the source code. Back when I was reviewing add-ons there (a long time ago), I did compile the supplied source a…
-
comment
Comment #36241149
Note : I am the author of this article. I have no idea what it takes to get “featured” but having seen how pretty much any extension gets this tag, including plenty of malicious on…
-
comment
Comment #36212729
Unfortunately, an extension in use is expected to behave very differently from one that was merely installed. That’s the crux with observing software in sandboxes in order to deter…
-
comment
Comment #36189464
Note : I’m the author of this article. We aren’t talking about breaking out of the sandbox here, the extension sandbox stays intact. The problem is that this sandbox has plenty of …
-
comment
Comment #36170116
As I said, outright malicious extensions will always find a way. I now discovered a newer variant of these extensions, this time using Manifest V3. And they still run arbitrary cod…
-
comment
Comment #36153562
Yes, much better to let 55 million users blame the browser for redirecting search queries, excessive ads, erratic behavior and data leaks. :-) Funny thing is: I can imagine Google …
-
comment
Comment #36151952
Back when I reviewed add-ons for Mozilla Add-ons, I did in fact verify that the source code produced the same build result as the extension submitted. Was tricky occasionally but u…
-
comment
Comment #36150316
Note : I am the author of this article. Mozilla and Opera require source code to be uploaded along with the extension, there is some human component involved in the review there. M…