Viewing profile — paf31
paf31
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 25, 2011, 7:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 357
- Public activity
- 148 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About paf31
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #8361906
Do you mean PureScript?
-
comment
Comment #8361900
I think it really depends what you're trying to do. There's definitely a class of problems where the impact of a runtime type error would be low. But there are plenty of other case…
-
comment
Comment #8355832
> I fail yet to see what advantages PureScript brings compared to Elm. I think they fit different use cases. Elm is excellent at interactive web apps using FRP. PureScript is a lit…
-
comment
Comment #8355827
There are a few options, but the most fully-formed is probably purescript-react. I'm also interested to see where the virtual-dom bindings go. The last chapter of the book covers h…
-
comment
Comment #8353884
Yes - in fact, that's the approach we encourage for working with immutable arrays: https://github.com/purescript/purescript-arrays
-
comment
Comment #8353745
It uses JavaScript's evaluation model - i.e. strict, but you can write lazy code using libraries, such as purescript-lazy.
-
comment
Comment #8353073
It has been discussed before: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/issues/396 The reason I have been against the idea so far is that an integer type is easily accomplished usin…
-
comment
Comment #8352819
Consider a recursive function like factorial: fact :: Number -> Number fact 0 = 1 fact n = n * fact (n - 1) This will build stack frames and fail with a stack overflow for large in…
-
comment
Comment #8352666
Free HTML version is here: https://leanpub.com/purescript/read
-
comment
Comment #8352500
(Copied from below) I've written quite a lot of TypeScript, and I generally feel very productive in it, but occasionally I feel like I want more from the type system (type classes,…
-
comment
Comment #8352497
I've written quite a lot of TypeScript, and I generally feel very productive in it, but occasionally I feel like I want more from the type system (type classes, rank-N types, sum t…
-
comment
Comment #8352386
I think it's definitely possible to put knowledge of Haskell to use in PureScript, but it's not like Fay, Haste, GHCJS etc. where you can copy code verbatim. I think of PureScript …
-
comment
Comment #8352292
"Simple readable JavaScript" as opposed to the sort of output you might expect from compilers for other Haskell-like languages which attempt to preserve Haskell's semantics. Certai…
-
comment
Comment #8352276
PureScript developer here. Happy to see this here, and happy to answer any questions.
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #8311047
You couldn't pay me enough to work on some stacks. Also, certain technologies do a good job of convincing potential employees that you know what you're doing and committed to using…
-
comment
Comment #8309638
Also why not consider remote employees?