Viewing profile — ozankabak
ozankabak
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 21, 2012, 4:26 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 28
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ozankabak
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
story
Ask HN: Does ChatGPT plugins use prompt chaining or a toolformer-like approach?
AFAICT, there is no authoritative information from OpenAI on how ChatGPT plugins work (please correct me if I'm wrong). However, is there any interesting external analysis on how i…
-
comment
Comment #35104264
We bank with Mercury and I couldn't get a hold of them in business hours after receiving this email at 5:30PM CET on a Friday (unsurprisingly). This email seems odd to me, Mercury …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #28163606
Does the set of validators really need to be static (or fixed-size)? I may be missing something obvious, but it seems like we can also support a dynamic set. Consider the following…
-
comment
Comment #28158928
Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #28141785
Where can I find more information about the "Succinct counting blocked Bloom filter"? Can you point to an implementation or a document? Thanks.
-
comment
Comment #27943556
I was thinking about the signature issue as well. In flat space (i.e. Minkowski metric), this would imply a constant four-potential with an imaginary 0'th component, which I can no…
-
comment
Comment #27943325
IIUC the authors are saying that if we associate the metric with the four-potential via an outer product, they get a picture coherent with the current understanding of how electrom…
-
comment
Comment #25123356
So if we have a theory expressive enough to make statements about ordinary (Peano) arithmetic, we can always form a self-referential statement within the framework of this theory w…
-
comment
Comment #25020096
You are talking about Sprecher's modification to the original Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem, right? This version, and its implications, have been a lingering wondering for me for quite…
-
comment
Comment #24065309
No, but s/he might tell you that it is safe to count on God being an important concept to many people for the foreseeable future. In the same vein, gold will likely be perceived as…
-
comment
Comment #23728982
Clear, concise and to the point. Looking forward to reading the rest. If you finish the whole series and fix/improve the posts in this sequence using the feedback from here, I thin…
-
comment
Comment #14534869
I don't understand if they use windowing as a fixed computational step that is active both in training and scoring time, or, if they use sliding windows only to chop up the trainin…
-
comment
Comment #9227886
Your "invisible frogs" would not be a reformulation of Newtonian Mechanics (NM). A reformulation needs to make the exact same predictions as the original theory. There are many ref…
-
comment
Comment #5579395
Yes. I don't know the exact dynamics of their toy problem, but thinking about it this way can help: When the rod falls over, it will stay there from then on. In terms of the number…