Viewing profile — owalt
owalt
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 07, 2021, 9:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 95
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About owalt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46927968
They're saying the naive implementation was more than 150 lines of C code (300-450 bytes), i.e. too big.
-
comment
Comment #46091323
No, it is correct. The integral is with respect to x, and the ordinary/partial derivatives are with respect to t. Written out fully, the derivative computation is d/dt (x^t - 1)/ln…
-
comment
Comment #41105369
I'm not quite sure whether you're asking for an explanation or whether you're simply making the observation that this is often omitted from the discussion. Either way I think it's …
-
comment
Comment #37416217
Yes, for instance ...101010 (the pattern 10 repeated infinitely) isn't an integer. It's maybe easier to think of the argument as working on sequences: From a sequence (x_0, x_1, x_…
-
comment
Comment #37415441
I don't quite understand your main concern, but it seems others did and have answered. To elaborate on why Cantor's argument doesn't go through for the integers: Assume you had a l…
-
comment
Comment #37127041
This does not – according to what I can see from the code and comments – implement the case of algebraic extensions. As someone only really familiar with the implementation of the …
-
comment
Comment #37038042
That's incredibly cool looking!
-
comment
Comment #37022097
Indeed. As someone who (in the past) struggled a lot with eating, fasting would not have been a solution - it was the entire problem! This is the first cookbook I've read that seem…
-
comment
Comment #36728719
To be fair to the author (and I know this is by no means obvious context coming into the video), his channel blew up shortly before this video. His previous audience consisted of p…
-
comment
Comment #36687185
> Ah, matrices! Does * mean dot product, cross product, or the usually less useful matrix multiplication? Ooh, or maybe you should you use . for dot! How clever that would be! Why …
-
comment
Comment #36528431
I do my current work (embedded) on an architecture with the following properties: - 8-bit bytes - 16-bit aligned accesses to 32-bit types - 32-bit aligned accesses to 64-bit types.…
-
comment
Comment #36461453
From the article: > Normally, I would probably not make these member functions, but since The Witness is a more C++-ish codebase than my own, I thought it was more consistent with …
-
comment
Comment #35125899
I work on a For us the day will come where we atone for our sins and have to again put off feature updates for months of RAM optimization. But in the PC/server/mobile space, that d…
-
comment
Comment #34919136
Most people have no idea how to detect basic non-blatant cheats. Even simple low-FoV aimbots sneak past the vast majority of players. Good enough cheats are virtually undetectable …
-
comment
Comment #34163799
Short version of the difference: Safety = This shouldn't cause harm. Security = This should be hard to hack.
-
comment
Comment #34163635
It's worth noting that ISO 26262 is mostly concerned with preventing faults due to system failure, e.g. spurious hardware faults, hardware degradation over time, etc. As an example…
-
comment
Comment #32270280
Primarily a Windows user here (though not really by choice) and I guess I'll bite - what does it matter what people put on the Desktop? Are there any security implications of not k…
-
comment
Comment #32203311
Honestly I'm usually very wary of additions to C, as one of its greatest strengths (to me) is how rather straightforward it is as a language in terms of conceptual simplicity. Ther…
-
comment
Comment #31234568
Worth noting that the Devil's algorithm is not a sequence of turns you repeat over and over, but one that takes you through every possible cube state. You "abort" it partway throug…
-
comment
Comment #31176201
None of this is really worth obsessing over I think, but one point in favor of imperative is it tends to also be the tersest phrasing, which is convenient if you're also aiming for…
-
comment
Comment #30721389
True, that's a good point and I pretty much agree with you entirely. I didn't really make a distinction between argument and anecdote. Basically I think it's being glossed over tha…
-
comment
Comment #30720455
I think the article is interesting, but I think it glosses over the very real cost of working like this. As someone with a career in safety-critical software (aerospace, automotive…
-
comment
Comment #29981820
A little reductive I would say? I would add at least: * Puzzle (The Witness, Baba is You, Antichamber, Manifold Garden, ...) * Survival/open-world (Minecraft, Terraria, Don't Starv…
-
comment
Comment #29139171
Is it really because game development is "decades behind", or just because games are among the few pieces of software still developed against hard performance constraints? Loosely-…
-
comment
Comment #29099160
I thought most game devs were into the paradigm of: check external libraries straight into your source control, update them never, and generally treat them on par with your own cod…