Viewing profile — outer_web
outer_web
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 05, 2025, 5:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 411
- Public activity
- 279 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About outer_web
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43708909
Should be interesting to see the DOJ's response. Considering the wagons have been circled since day one, we may see an independent prosecutor execute this referral. If so, discover…
-
comment
Comment #43708809
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #43708708
> “The Court ultimately determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause…
-
comment
Comment #43708670
Political? This is law and crime. It's also relevant to someone, such as yourself, who occasionally comments on civil liberties.
-
comment
Comment #43708603
Please do enough reading to realize this is a different case.
-
comment
Comment #43708589
Surely the Eric Adams thing was an isolated incident!
-
comment
Comment #43705982
Trump v. United States. He could theoretically be impeached but if Congress wasn't going to it after he kinetically attacked them, it's not going to happen. Others: pardon power.
-
comment
Comment #43705955
Might be what they used prior to taking office, having not spent a career using systems approved for classified information.
-
comment
Comment #43701015
Say what you will about his funding methods but the wall solved immigration as promised. Never heard about illegal border crossings again after it was built.
-
comment
Comment #43700973
You post something and based on its content you assume someone from an ideological group flagged it. And for that reason you flag and opinion of someone you assume is from that gro…
-
comment
Comment #43699826
I stand corrected. Please flag anything you disagree with.
-
comment
Comment #43699066
This seems like an advertisement.
-
comment
Comment #43697911
Lol in consecutive comments you claim the whistleblower made it up and NPR made it up. Take a break.
-
comment
Comment #43697875
The "looking at" process is still subject to federal law.
-
comment
Comment #43697774
"People don't like my opinions therefore I am going to sabotage the discussion from obscurity."
-
comment
Comment #43697699
You flag posts with politics because you don't like having been flagged?
-
comment
Comment #43696315
He told Time (POTY interview) that because Congress didn't fund his wall idea and he had to take it from the military, he was going to do everything through executive action.
-
comment
Comment #43696247
Finally the government is run like a business - a magical world outsourcing, capricious decisionmaking, and c-suite self-delusion. I am so glad we slaughtered the Deep State that m…
-
comment
Comment #43696161
Agree with your conclusion but the SCOTUS order was much softer than that, slapping the lower court's terminology while passing the enforcement burden back down (and all but ensuri…
-
comment
Comment #43688577
So this money is already appropriated and going to be redirected to institutions that pledge fealty?
-
comment
Comment #43688570
Politics was already short on ideological consistency before the age of alternative facts.
-
comment
Comment #43688455
I am going to be so much more productive now that I'm incentivized to code everything from scratch.
-
comment
Comment #43685698
Especially the most conservative person.
-
comment
Comment #43685223
Uh yeah, why wouldn't I? I mean I don't know that it's their policy but it sure looks that way.
-
comment
Comment #43685192
Or the Supreme Court.