Viewing profile — ouhamouch

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]

This is your imaginary archive from the world of pink ponies. Meanwhile their IMA on Reddit: no promises, no commitment. Just like Microsoft EULA :) https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHo…

I agree, JS is much worse. Because anyone could create an "untrustworthy" page on archive.org, no hack or admin assistance is required.

Watch https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=1vuio0pswjnm7 they post AT-free recipes for many paywalls

We do not know what was important in that doxx. Probably nothing and the DDoS hype was intentional to distract attention and highlight J.P.'s doxx among the other, making them insi…

for instance on the economist: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46060487

There are number of blog posts like owner-archive-today . blogspot . com 2 years old, like J.P's first post on AT

The property of the medium: no one would repost or discuss "something sensical".

that is not the worst scream (especially after FBI and Russian trail). better to shout anything than to die in silence

it gives them a voice.

There are even YouTube videos (of GamerGate-time, thus before AI era) with a guy claiming to be the site owner. A bit difficult to OSINT :)

Yes. Archive.org snapshots may load javascript from external sites, where the original page had loaded them. That script can change anything on the page. Most often, the domain is …

Altered snapshots = hide Nora name? ArsTechica just did the same - removed Nora from older articles. How can you trust ArsTechica after that?

from the Ars article: --- US publishers have been fighting web services designed to bypass paywalls. In July, the News/Media Alliance said it secured the takedown of paywall-bypass…

AT answered why the DDoS and why it is still active https://lj.rossia.org/users/archive_today/2478.html

They are owner of ArsTechnica which wrote 3rd (or 4th?) article on AT in a row painting it in certain colors. The article about FBI subpoena that pulled J.P's speculations out of t…

[dead]

The fight is not about where it is shown and not about what, not about "links in Wikipedia", but about whether News Inc will be able to kill AT, as they did with 12FT.

That was private negotiations, btw, not public statements. In response to J.P's blog already framed AT as project grown from a carding forum + pushed his speculations onto ArsTechn…