Viewing profile — ospillinger
ospillinger
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 10:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 45
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ospillinger
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #21519738
That makes sense. Programmatically updating cortex.yaml is a common use case especially when you're thinking about continuous deployment. We also have a Python client which can rep…
-
comment
Comment #21518495
Hey Aaron, I work on Cortex which is a tool for continuously deploying models as HTTP endpoints on AWS. Under the hood we use Kubernetes instead of Lambda to avoid cold starts, ena…
-
comment
Comment #21340016
From the MLflow Models docs: "An MLflow Model is a standard format for packaging machine learning models that can be used in a variety of downstream tools—for example, real-time se…
-
comment
Comment #21289285
Each model is loaded into a Docker container, along with any Python packages and request handling code. The cluster runs on EKS on your AWS account. Cortex takes the declarative co…
-
comment
Comment #21289154
Yes, Cortex uses ONNX Runtime ( https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime ) under the hood so any model that can be exported to ONNX can be deployed.
- comment
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20580684
Good idea, I definitely think it's doable.
-
comment
Comment #20580590
The Terraform provider idea is interesting, I'll think about it more carefully. Almost all of our deployment configuration under the hood is done with Kubernetes (which is focused …
-
comment
Comment #20580585
My understanding is that Seldon and Kubeflow are more geared towards infrastructure engineers. Our goal is to hide the infrastructure tooling so that Kuberentes, Docker, or AWS exp…
-
comment
Comment #20580354
Thanks for the feedback! We aren't trying to invent another infrastructure provisioning language, and I agree that Terraform would be the right choice if that was the case. Our YAM…
-
comment
Comment #20579629
We solve a similar problem to SageMaker but we are focused on developer experience and flexibility. - Deployments are defined with declarative configuration and no custom Docker im…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story