Viewing profile — orson2077
orson2077
HN member- Joined
- Fri, May 31, 2024, 9:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About orson2077
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46660890
Good lord, read Termination Shock by Neil Stephenson. Stratospheric aerosol injection is effective, but comes with severe risks, and can even be used as a strategic weapon (e.g. in…
-
comment
Comment #44143499
For anyone interested in the economics of fission reactors, Illinois Energy Prof did a GREAT video a while back: https://youtu.be/cbeJIwF1pVY?feature=shared
-
comment
Comment #43241821
My impression was that stratospheric aerosol injection has been kept out of the public consciousness deliberately. If the public discussed it now, they’d learn quickly about things…
-
comment
Comment #40958124
Hah! Sliding keyboard, that absolutely rocks!
-
comment
Comment #40958073
iPhone 4 was the apex of phone design, I will die on this hill!
-
comment
Comment #40958070
Amen. An updated 4" flagship would be incredible! They say that small phones are for people with small hands, but no-one can one-hand a 6" phone without holding it like an idiot. I…
-
comment
Comment #40881588
There's no physics basis for teleportation, whereas there is a clear physics basis for fusion. The way you assess things is terribly flawed.
-
comment
Comment #40810817
Don't take this the wrong way, but I envy your naivete. You are extremely optimistic about people and politics.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40804412
Fusion-relevant materials research could have absolutely advanced with funding back in the 70s. Lithium compatible structural material and 14MeV neutron source experiments immediat…
-
comment
Comment #40803614
Fusion is always 50 years away for a reason: https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/5gi9yh/fusion_i... IIRC, the sum total of all fusion research throughout all of history is…
-
comment
Comment #40778440
They looked into this concept a while back and came to the conclusion that unless the population density was great enough along the guideway, the maintenance cost was too high.
-
comment
Comment #40704433
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40704432
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40704430
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40704095
Is this article a joke? - The chapter titled "Advanced reactors may make waste problem worse" mentions nothing about waste. - The chapter titled "Not likely to help cut emissions" …
-
comment
Comment #40679523
They’re using hyperbole to illustrate the point; don’t miss the point or deliberately try to derail the conversation.
-
comment
Comment #40540850
Hey, I'd love to live like the elves in Lord of the Rings, but it's not gonna happen. The first world offloads its manufacturing burden to the third world, then criticises them for…
-
comment
Comment #40540831
Regarding their main points: - Too expensive. Nuclear power plants usually operate for 40-80 years, making their ROI after the 20 year mark (greatly varies). The report's choice of…
-
comment
Comment #40540709
I have a tremendous love for the fast breeder reactors (particularly Superphénix); that we had that technology so long ago astounds me. However, I recognise that they are technical…
-
comment
Comment #40540679
Modern powerplants are closed-loop and do not consume water, although they may dump heat into it. Water is not consumed (in any great quantity) or contaminated, except that which i…
-
comment
Comment #40540466
(Background: I am an engineer that has spent most of their career in energy - fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables - the whole shebang. I care deeply about climate change, and reco…