Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — option1138

option1138

HN member
Joined
Tue, Sep 20, 2011, 3:29 PM UTC
HN karma
19
Public activity
24 items

About option1138

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #3430884

    Very good example of why developers are dumb for writing mobile apps. It makes zero business sense with the exception of the very few who sell hundreds of thousands. Apple screws t…

  2. comment
    Comment #3306353

    Not really a lot of relevant experience. Would like to see some Hadoop or heck, even some C#. Let's talk again in a year or two.

  3. comment
    Comment #3302342

    Successful high tech CEO here. I don't know where all of this bad advice came from, but you should never, ever have an equal cofounder.

  4. comment
    Comment #3283829

    same here...

  5. comment
    Comment #3241882

    I'm in the course as well and don't really understand what the fuss about Octave is. The help system is abysmal and third-party library support seems far behind other popular platf…

  6. comment
    Comment #3170454

    this I see such bad financial advice coming from those who obviously have never made money (shouldn't be surprising, I guess). And then when someone comes along who has made a lot …

  7. comment
    Comment #3132751

    $630? Why is this on the front page? Why does anyone even care? This is not important.

  8. comment
    Comment #3128253

    And assuming they could (despite your arguments against) determine the method of monetization on a site I can assure you that that they cannot do this accurately. You would be amaz…

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #3105715

    Exactly, right? I mean, I read that and thought "I'd kill OP to be 20 again". 20... no job, no ambition, no problems.

  11. comment
    Comment #3105689

    I want you to put this in perspective. I read your previous post and you were working a shit job. I am a CEO of a tech company and I can assure you I know what you are talking abou…

  12. comment
    Comment #3105655

    I know you were looking for an answer from Matt but I thought I would offer up my opinion here (as you might have noticed, I love talking about this stuff). Our models currently su…

  13. comment
    Comment #3105567

    This really made me think. But I took exception to your comment: I agree but don't you think that from an algorithmic point of view Google would be better looking at what the user …

  14. comment
    Comment #3105496

    Matt, You are of course correct. The fault is mine for miscommunicating... I find myself becoming less self-editorial these days when I write on the web and tend to think everyone …

  15. comment
    Comment #3105441

    We do mean well, and for the most part when people say we're arrogant it's because we didn't hire them, or they're unhappy with our policies, or something along those lines. They'r…

  16. comment
    Comment #3102685

    This is a fair comment but I believe the issues stem more from the process Google follows. It is obvious that Google cannot communicate exact reasons why a site was penalized as th…

  17. comment
    Comment #3102667

    That's the ultimate check on Google: if we start to act too abusive or "evil" we know that people can desert us. So it's in our enlightened self-interest to try to act in our users…

  18. comment
    Comment #3101333

    Sadly, quite true. "True" - because my current understanding (which Matt_Cutts can elucidate on if he chooses to) is that Google has looked into - but does not currently incorporat…

  19. comment
    Comment #3101100

    I think %50 of the problem is the arbitrary picking of sites to block (and it's not working, btw[1]) and %50 of it is that google seems uninterested in explaining or advising peopl…

  20. comment
    Comment #3101089

    Hi Matt, We don't know each other but I think we know of each other. I'm rather immersed in webspam detection and found this incredibly interesting. You imply that the challenge is…

  21. comment
    Comment #3096252

    Google:Social::Microsoft:Search

  22. comment
    Comment #3086346

    True, I thought I mentioned the color thing, but I guess not. You definitely could not read a TRS-80 clearly on a TV. You could on an Apple, but who would? Most people - remember t…

  23. comment
    Comment #3083946

    I have to disagree. I used the Apple IIe and the TRS-80 extensively during this period. I coded games and other software in BASIC and assembly on both machines. I poured over the s…

  24. comment
    Comment #3017930

    Interesting service and a nice UI. I just gave it a shot. Interested to see how well it works!