Viewing profile — opt-skept
opt-skept
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 16
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About opt-skept
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40095191
Sorry in advance for the verbosity, but I really feel like we're crossing paths. The US doesn't want to start a war with China. The US wants to prevent China's rise. It wants to do…
-
comment
Comment #40095102
Today I learned "gish galloping". No, I am a wordy person and I apologize for that. I think you'll find it isn't an excessive amount of arguments, but an excessive amount of detail…
-
comment
Comment #40094097
Okay, so for (b) we agree that China does not want to agitate a war with the US; that it would like to avoid it. For (a) you do not have an area of critique where you believe any c…
-
comment
Comment #40093069
The Belfare Center for Science and International Affairs has a nice report ( https://www.belfercenter.org/thucydides-trap/case-file ) indicating this is a good predictor for confli…
-
comment
Comment #40092709
While I disagree with this on its own merit, its important to point out this does not address the question/topic. Asked above was: (a) What steps of reasoning do you think are unso…
-
comment
Comment #40092446
Thank you for the thoughtful response and for sharing your opinion. About the standard you propose. It's interesting, but there might be some issues with it. I am writing this not …
-
comment
Comment #40090423
I'm a bit confused about the question and how this relates to the topic. I don't know how many journalists are lurking non-front page HN stories, so you'll probably get a non-journ…
-
comment
Comment #40090083
Could you add some more information about what steps of reasoning you find unsound, or what reasons you believe China would have to agitate for a conflict? The "Thucydides Trap" an…
-
comment
Comment #40089944
> Just to be clear, what are we talking about here exactly? An ostensible war would be to set back China's growth and its trajectory of growth. The US has little interest in govern…
-
comment
Comment #40087939
Note, this isn't going to be a surprise attack. China is developing access to hold the infrastructure at risk as a retaliation/deterrent for an American attack on China. It is high…
-
comment
Comment #40019142
Is it "largely" for filtering search results that civilians will have easy access to, in line with IDF narratives and perspectives (?)
-
comment
Comment #39974896
This has a range of 400+km (100kmph = 4 hours to respond). It's purpose to maintain an accurate picture of the sky, tracking many objects at the same time at different altitudes. T…
-
comment
Comment #38940879
In my opinion we're protecting from LLM generated content all wrong. A modest proposal: (a) Put LLMs in the defensive role, give them the social media posts (for example) and let t…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #38636306
I disagree. I think inspecting the output from Qualys (and other tools, including SAST) are substantially and manifestly different from inspecting Kubernetes logs. I would worry th…
-
comment
Comment #38636012
Eh... maybe. I think "configuring SAST" goes back to what you had previously said about "tool monkeys". Now there's thousands of potential issues. Many are false positives. Who is …
-
comment
Comment #38635857
As part of the industry, I can tell you I've personally found dozens (hundreds?) of vulnerabilities per year for the more than decade running of my career. The same is true of my c…
-
comment
Comment #38635811
I'm on two sides about this article. The first side is that ultimately the argument that the author debunks is a strawman argument, and the counter-arguments are equally sophomoric…