Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — opt-skept

opt-skept

HN member
Joined
Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:39 PM UTC
HN karma
16
Public activity
18 items

About opt-skept

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40095191

    Sorry in advance for the verbosity, but I really feel like we're crossing paths. The US doesn't want to start a war with China. The US wants to prevent China's rise. It wants to do…

  2. comment
    Comment #40095102

    Today I learned "gish galloping". No, I am a wordy person and I apologize for that. I think you'll find it isn't an excessive amount of arguments, but an excessive amount of detail…

  3. comment
    Comment #40094097

    Okay, so for (b) we agree that China does not want to agitate a war with the US; that it would like to avoid it. For (a) you do not have an area of critique where you believe any c…

  4. comment
    Comment #40093069

    The Belfare Center for Science and International Affairs has a nice report ( https://www.belfercenter.org/thucydides-trap/case-file ) indicating this is a good predictor for confli…

  5. comment
    Comment #40092709

    While I disagree with this on its own merit, its important to point out this does not address the question/topic. Asked above was: (a) What steps of reasoning do you think are unso…

  6. comment
    Comment #40092446

    Thank you for the thoughtful response and for sharing your opinion. About the standard you propose. It's interesting, but there might be some issues with it. I am writing this not …

  7. comment
    Comment #40090423

    I'm a bit confused about the question and how this relates to the topic. I don't know how many journalists are lurking non-front page HN stories, so you'll probably get a non-journ…

  8. comment
    Comment #40090083

    Could you add some more information about what steps of reasoning you find unsound, or what reasons you believe China would have to agitate for a conflict? The "Thucydides Trap" an…

  9. comment
    Comment #40089944

    > Just to be clear, what are we talking about here exactly? An ostensible war would be to set back China's growth and its trajectory of growth. The US has little interest in govern…

  10. comment
    Comment #40087939

    Note, this isn't going to be a surprise attack. China is developing access to hold the infrastructure at risk as a retaliation/deterrent for an American attack on China. It is high…

  11. comment
    Comment #40019142

    Is it "largely" for filtering search results that civilians will have easy access to, in line with IDF narratives and perspectives (?)

  12. comment
    Comment #39974896

    This has a range of 400+km (100kmph = 4 hours to respond). It's purpose to maintain an accurate picture of the sky, tracking many objects at the same time at different altitudes. T…

  13. comment
    Comment #38940879

    In my opinion we're protecting from LLM generated content all wrong. A modest proposal: (a) Put LLMs in the defensive role, give them the social media posts (for example) and let t…

  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #38636306

    I disagree. I think inspecting the output from Qualys (and other tools, including SAST) are substantially and manifestly different from inspecting Kubernetes logs. I would worry th…

  16. comment
    Comment #38636012

    Eh... maybe. I think "configuring SAST" goes back to what you had previously said about "tool monkeys". Now there's thousands of potential issues. Many are false positives. Who is …

  17. comment
    Comment #38635857

    As part of the industry, I can tell you I've personally found dozens (hundreds?) of vulnerabilities per year for the more than decade running of my career. The same is true of my c…

  18. comment
    Comment #38635811

    I'm on two sides about this article. The first side is that ultimately the argument that the author debunks is a strawman argument, and the counter-arguments are equally sophomoric…