Viewing profile — oneplane
oneplane
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 03, 2016, 12:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,820
- Public activity
- 2,774 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About oneplane
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49034821
It's been extensively reported on, and any AWS user that clicks on the health dashboard would also have seen it, even if they don't consume from news outlets. As for use it gets: p…
-
comment
Comment #48575472
How is it crazy? It's perhaps not granular (the repository is the boundary, and that's that), but you can definitely restrict who can pull or push as easy as you can make rules for…
-
comment
Comment #48391166
What are you even talking about. Every M1 Mac and earlier runs Linux. Even all the way back to PowerPC. Granted, the M1 and up are not 100% covered yet (driver-wise), but they aren…
-
comment
Comment #48391112
Since SIP, it's MDM with DDM and you can basically leave engineers be local admins as it has no impact on the system state anymore.
-
comment
Comment #48212376
I'd rather go back to bare metal than use Azure.
-
comment
Comment #48122054
Those local options exist, and have been around forever, but the problem is nobody is doing it without cutting corners and with pay-as-you-go elasticity (and the 'call an API, get …
-
comment
Comment #48121977
Not really, some of the IP is core to the product and it cannot function without it. In theory if you do something like come up with a complete replacement for EUV, you could, but …
-
comment
Comment #47750686
Which is why I wrote about running the exact UI that was referenced, with the same window server, window manager and desktop environment.
-
comment
Comment #47743705
That statement makes no sense. X11 works fine on macOS and running it in rootful mode with Gnome essentially works the same way it would work on an OS that uses the Linux kernel. G…
-
comment
Comment #47717227
It does, it's called FreeIPA (or RedHat IdM). The only GPO parts it doesn't do are those that are not related to policy in the IAM sense (i.e. configuring some application related …
-
comment
Comment #47586952
Oh yeah, you got the same process down pretty much yourself, wasn't an RTFM dig or anything like that. It was more aimed at others who might end up here, more tools, more better! I…
-
comment
Comment #47581264
There is a lot of documentation from Apple on how all of this works, but this is indeed expected behaviour. A way to make this smoother would have been: 1. Doing the password reset…
-
comment
Comment #47535290
Run it in a restricted VM, which is not joined to AD and cannot talk to it either. PAM will not save you, either will Airlock Digital or something like ATP or anything else like it…
-
comment
Comment #47304051
That online builder is very cool, well done! I've been trying out similar things to help internal teams to use systems and languages like Rego (for Open Policy Agent) to have a vis…
-
comment
Comment #46995833
When they shrank the disc it just became minidisc ;-) But that was technically MO, not just optical. And: it was in a cartridge so I suppose they really should have called it minid…
-
comment
Comment #46820047
Don't enable anything you don't need. Use the OS-native priority modes; i.e. no Slack messages after 18:00, no general message notifications unless from specific contacts, disable …
-
comment
Comment #46275340
I think the comment mainly pointed out the distinction between education using digital methods, vs. educating about digital things.
-
comment
Comment #45980083
It's not a counterpoint, it's a display of your factually incorrect statement.
-
comment
Comment #45947680
> In other words, you're completely fucked if you brick your install. I consider iBoot a direct user-hostile downgrade from UEFI for this reason. That's a bit of a creative perspec…
-
comment
Comment #45945702
Only if you boot into macOS and connect it to the internet. iBoot2 never changes by itself, you, the user, decides if you want to boot into recovery or macOS and run an update. So …
-
comment
Comment #45616863
Gee, another "we did not need cloud, so by not using cloud, we stopped spending on something we did not need"-story. Duh. The real story is why someone who doesn't need cloud servi…
-
comment
Comment #45545718
The problem was that the user's credentials were revoked but because the root account was a shared credential it wasn't revoked. Was the break-glass account also a user-specific ac…
-
comment
Comment #45532278
Not using root means not bypassing policies. There is no way to not bypass all policies. So yes, never using root makes that issue go away completely. As for all the other stuff: w…
-
comment
Comment #45532259
No, a massive amount of CloudTrail logs.
-
comment
Comment #45531378
You don't need the root account, unless you need to bypass all policies. In such a scenario, you a use the root access reset flow instead, reducing standing access. As for other fl…