Viewing profile — omon
omon
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 08, 2017, 3:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About omon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17372190
Don't bother, for some, no matter what is true they'd prefer to live with some adverse abstraction to overcome; it provides unity, purpose, and a sense of importance.
- story
-
comment
Comment #17253234
Yet we're able to discuss topics with each other, this is the basis of Poincare's Inter-subjective reality. There must be some commonalities of experience which allows us to map ou…
-
comment
Comment #17253214
The author cares about that, it's his abstract. In the same way a scientist would care about the precision and conclusions of results obtained from an older study--you are forced t…
-
comment
Comment #17251653
Not really it's a common noun, which just means non-physical objects which exist in some way, even if Nominalist. You're confusing platonic with Platonic realism which are differen…
-
comment
Comment #17251541
Wholly irrelevant, the paper is specifically concerned with recovering a dialectic between W. O. Quine and M. Dummett. Even if the question was the more general, "Is Logic Metaphys…
-
comment
Comment #17052157
It doesn't have to be explained why, it is. The why would be a separate question requiring reasoning. Things can be true without an explanation as to why they happen. It's not an a…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #15765982
He is specifically talking about blocking web traffic, "The answer to the first is we're not sure", not fast lanes. Repealing NN will do that, every time you have regulations you h…
-
comment
Comment #15765925
If we could easily build our own internet then there would be no need to regulate the internet at all.
-
comment
Comment #15765648
I hate to be an apologist, but you're the only one who is mistaken here, he specifically is talking about the blocking of web traffic not fast lanes: "The answer to the first is we…
-
comment
Comment #15428579
Trustless transactions: transactions with a guarantee of state.