Viewing profile — olluk

It's pretty good, my 16 y.o. son will be stuck in it for many hours. I like that you can select a train and see its stops. It would be equally awesome to select a station and see t…

I agree. It's a sarcasm of the new reality. What is copying vs writing from scratch? The line is blurred now, non-existent. You can ask an LLM to re-write any open source to a degr…

Close your source if you don't want it to be read by LLM

Hot! Back to the 80s with these memory prices

I'd call managed C#, Java, Go, Pythhon, JS, etc. Something with GC e.g., managed memory

That all true but at some point the combinations of paths explode. It is not possible to write tests for all the combinations then it possible to cover them eventually with some pr…

Perhaps the multi-master approach is the example of system where incoherent does not mean terminal illnesses.

We write to WAL and then register the transaction in the transaction sequence registry. If a concurrent transaction registered between the start and the end of the transaction, we …

Comparison with old version is actually in the article for the patient reader. It could go to the top but I don't think it will make a difference. At the end of the day it is the a…

There were 2 queries in the QuestDB benchmark over the same table. ClickHouse didn't even try to match both of them choosing one as a victim. I guess that's what happens when you o…

My personal view is that having fast queries without indexes is quite general outcome.

No, there are no indexes in QuestDB in the article. None. Zero. That's bold mistake in the ClickHouse article. Should be named Yes, QuestDb is Faster.

Looks like QuestDB is faster if you don't optimize your table storage for 1 query. But if you are okay that only limited number of columns to be scanned faster than others ClickHou…

What if the purpose of the article is to compare queries without indexes?