Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — okwasniewski

okwasniewski

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 24, 2024, 9:37 PM UTC
HN karma
76
Public activity
19 items

About okwasniewski

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48592861

    We found gemini 3 flash to be the best model as of now, when it comes to bang for the buck, GPT 5.5 is also a bit more expensive than 5.4, if we run tests at scale it has to be aff…

  2. comment
    Comment #48592844

    We've been doing quite a lot of context engineering and optimizations to make sure it's not as expensive. The subsequent runs are faster because we cache the trajectory of the agen…

  3. comment
    Comment #48591824

    Currently, only iOS, but we can add iPadOS too!

  4. comment
    Comment #48591816

    Happy to hear that!

  5. comment
    Comment #48589252

    Yeah, we have all of them. I saw it too where in bigger companies our emails were going straight to spam. Will migrate to it soon

  6. comment
    Comment #48588985

    Unfortunately from our experience tests don’t scale as well as code. First of all, static tests are very brittle: you rely on selectors, need wait times, and can’t really test a lo…

  7. comment
    Comment #48588964

    Our approach is heavily focused on agents, both for executing tests and for managing the platform. We want to provide the best and simplest way to conduct agentic testing, with a s…

  8. comment
    Comment #48588259

    We support both web and mobile, which is what a lot of companies prefer, just one agent for both. Also, I'm pretty sure Revyl relies only on vision models, which tend to be slower.…

  9. comment
    Comment #48588140

    Unfortunately from our experience tests don’t scale as well as code. First of all, static tests are very brittle: you rely on selectors, need wait times, and can’t really test a lo…

  10. comment
    Comment #48588113

    I feel like new AI model releases will only allow our agents to do more in-depth testing; the space still has a lot of room to grow. Quality assurance is way more complicated than …

  11. comment
    Comment #48588048

    Thank you! That's the goal

  12. comment
    Comment #48587889

    We use agents to navigate the app, making real-time decisions based on its state. I prefer to compare it more to a manual QA engineer than to static e2e tests. We spent a lot of ti…

  13. comment
    Comment #48587594

    Thank you!

  14. comment
    Comment #48587312

    We are thinking whether to change this.. We also have testerarmy.com/.ai

  15. comment
    Comment #48587297

    Yes! We spent quite a lot of time on this, and we are currently creating a test plan based on PR changes and sending an agent to verify it. We have some customers who are only usin…

  16. comment
    Comment #48586932

    Unfortunately from our experience tests don’t scale as well as code. First of all static tests are very brittle, you rely on selectors, need wait times and can’t really test a lot …

  17. comment
    Comment #48586803

    Yes, it works for any framework. We just get the built native binary and run it in the cloud. Regarding pricing, the self serve options are currently only for lower usage. We will …

  18. story
    Launch HN: TesterArmy (YC P26) – Agents that test web and mobile apps

    Hey HN - we’re Oskar, Szymon, and Piotr, and we’re building TesterArmy ( https://tester.army ). TesterArmy is an agentic testing platform that runs end-to-end checks before deploym…

  19. story