Viewing profile — ochronus
ochronus
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 10, 2009, 2:49 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,148
- Public activity
- 514 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ochronus
hi@ochronus.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49245610
Ugh, I see "future" and "meta" in the same sentence, hard nope
-
comment
Comment #49228566
The author is conflating coding with other parts of the sw engineer role.
-
comment
Comment #49206538
Yup, if you know what to point it at - where does _that_ skill come from? Experience.
-
comment
Comment #49206387
Wherever I worked (and as long as it was up to me), the mindset and expectation was that a junior we hire will need to become a medior in max 2 years. Of course, we provided the ri…
-
comment
Comment #49206276
If you do your hiring (and then mentorship) right, even such juniors can skyrocket in 1-2 years. AI won't do that. So, in case of willing juniors, you get much, much more "out of t…
-
comment
Comment #48974896
Huh? How so? Please add some sources
-
comment
Comment #48965215
Nope, it's the lawyer firms that come after you. Google removes reviews on request for its own comfort, but if you provide proof, they put it back. Then the lawyers come.
-
comment
Comment #48568165
This is lovely
-
comment
Comment #48460597
No, no, much better: make it a SKILL.md ;)
-
comment
Comment #48219267
I think Liquid Glass is a general UX/Product blunder, not a deliberate evil masterplan to force users to buy new phones.
-
comment
Comment #48204247
Doesn't match my personal experience over a handful of iPhone generations. I know, anecdotal only, but still.
-
comment
Comment #48138916
I see your point, but I'd be surprised if they'd lose a significant user base in the end; the hype is just way too high
-
comment
Comment #48136120
I don't think they are clueless, but rather, struggling. Being an AI provider is a money burner, and they probably don't have enough fuel for the fire anymore, so they are trying t…
-
comment
Comment #48136022
Yes, it's related to the limits of the subscription plans. 2ish months ago the same sub started hitting limits earlier and earlier on very similar tasks/codebases. Then they said, …
-
comment
Comment #48135640
Yeah, claude code is mostly unusable at this point. It's been in a constant decline for a good 1-2 months. It's more like a scam now.
-
comment
Comment #47930618
Hence the only other path: slow, constant enshittification of the models' performance
-
comment
Comment #47930589
As predicted by many. The math is, as usual, mathing.
-
comment
Comment #47859039
No, it's not, except for a small percentage of the userbase.
-
comment
Comment #47859035
Haha, right, just like the recent uncommunicated changes to limits, cache, etc.
-
comment
Comment #47671516
This is awesome! Thank you for building it!
-
comment
Comment #47648819
Hmm, the bug I hit lasted for days and burned through my credits/limits/tokens like crazy, consistently. It's gone after the last update.
-
comment
Comment #47637168
No, I think they mean: - https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7mkn3/psa_claud... - https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7zgj0/comment/o...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47636535
Ok, so this is how they try to compensate for their messed up month of bugs (insane token burn)
-
comment
Comment #47320080
Really cool :)