Viewing profile — oberhamsi
oberhamsi
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 02, 2013, 3:55 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About oberhamsi
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #7616593
modern browsers support webworkers so you get "threads" but still no shared memory.
-
comment
Comment #5649289
ah! I didn't think of it like that. That would be interesting to see... at which concurrency level the environments crap out.
-
comment
Comment #5649274
confusing but accurate :) The ability to script Java is one of Ringo's killer features - for this benchmark, for example, we dropped in two jars (JDBC myqlconnector & connection po…
-
comment
Comment #5646497
I think he is too polite to say: "patch please"
-
comment
Comment #5646471
I will test that. Should the latency stay more constant with higher concurrency? Or what am I searching for? Looking at the res/seq we got from round4. In order of concurrency (8, …
-
comment
Comment #5646397
the source is available. as a first guess: if an ORM is the typical way to do it in an env then it was used.
-
comment
Comment #5646389
If you split a single app instance onto 15 machines, you will lose some efficiency due to network communication unless those 15 instances can work isolated without any shared data …
-
comment
Comment #5646071
I implemented the Ringo app for this benchmark and of course ran it against Node and a couple of others to see how we would perform in this neighborhood before I opened the pull re…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5645914
I think you ran into your own argument: if you are very read heavy (and lots of big sites are), it's all about caching and the DB becomes irrelevant. QED really hard to get right
-
comment
Comment #5645903
Is there no php environment with a persistent server? Are they really all doing per request startup?
-
comment
Comment #5645318
try our RingoJs: it's JS on the JVM. Scripting Java with JavaScript.