Viewing profile — o-90
o-90
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 12:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About o-90
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40867147
> I also think that this opinion seems to be exactly in line with existing legal precedent. Truman was never prosecuted for the massacres he presided on. Nixon was never prosecuted…
-
comment
Comment #40823268
> They believe that Congress makes the laws, the Executive branch enforces them, and the Judicial branch interprets them. This process that you just described is what produced Chev…
-
comment
Comment #40075981
> That's an odd thing to say on a case where the government did absolutely coerce Facebook. But that's what this case is about. So "absolutely" is an incorrect word. The Supreme Co…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40067326
> If the government has the power to override the First Amendment by declaring an emergency, we'll always have "emergencies." If you simply listened to the oral arguments in this c…
-
comment
Comment #40065990
You're making my point for me. You read one sentence she said, and made a determination about the entire context of the argument, which , pointing this out, was the purpose of my o…
-
comment
Comment #40065127
You're talking about Murthy vs. Missouri (23-411). Justice Jackson poses a hypothetical on page 94 about "a new teen challenge that involved teens jumping out of windows at increas…
-
comment
Comment #40064527
Where/in what case was this argument made?
-
comment
Comment #39514331
The audio for oral arguments if anyone is interested in listening: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio/2...
-
comment
Comment #36884659
One explanation for this is that another country just has better military technology than the United States. And the cover-up/conspiracy is that the US government knows this, but j…