Viewing profile — nyssos
nyssos
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 10:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 324
- Public activity
- 217 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nyssos
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48163625
The relevant paragraph literally starts with "In India", where, yes, it's obviously the case that Hindus are not marginalized.
-
comment
Comment #48082636
Be absolutely ruthless with technical debt. Opus is perfectly capable of producing idiomatic code in any mainstream language you please, but will seize on any opportunity to justif…
-
comment
Comment #48082613
I also work on a large complex rust project (>1M LOC) with extensive use of Claude Code. It is very consistent with my experience. Claude frequently subverts the obvious intent of …
-
comment
Comment #48005756
Yes, and? Something can be both scare and inadequate to a given task. FAANG L5s cost a pretty penny but I wouldn't trust a random one to prove a crypto library correct.
-
comment
Comment #48005155
Agreed that we're not at saturation, but we don't have a canonical "best" either. For example ChatGPT 5.5 + Codex is, in my experience, vastly superior to Opus 4.7 + Claude Code at…
-
comment
Comment #48005020
You're presuming too much about what OP's quality standards are. Can SOTA models outperform the average junior engineer? Yes, obviously. Can they match the best human engineers, if…
-
comment
Comment #48005012
I do this for debugging. Models are extremely vulnerable to framing effects and it's usually easier to spin up a fresh instance than it is to get an existing one to generate new hy…
-
comment
Comment #46974298
> The C that shows up in quantum mechanics is likely an example of this--it's a case of physics having a a circular symmetry embedded in it (the phase of the wave functions) and ev…
-
comment
Comment #44407097
Classical logic is the presumed default for mathematics, if someone is working in a different system they will say so explicitly.
-
comment
Comment #42955113
Lawyer rates are extremely high variance, and the NYT is not hiring anywhere near the median. White shoe firms break $1000/hr routinely.
-
comment
Comment #42955088
> I thought a partner at a large law firm might get $ 500k or more per year Easily.
-
comment
Comment #42955035
> but my understanding of copyright is that if a person when into a clean room and wrote an new article from scratch, without having read any NYT, that just so happened to be exact…
-
comment
Comment #42851296
Life expectancy at birth is irrelevant, people who die in infancy don't consume many resources at all. What matters is the percentage of the population that's of working age, and h…
-
comment
Comment #42817013
Here's a less galactic version. Suppose you're implementing a binary tree where every leaf has to have the same height - a toy model of a self-balancing search tree. Here's an impl…
-
comment
Comment #42657762
> Yet Turing machines are about as far from abstract mathematics as one can get, because you can actually build these things in our physical universe and observe their behavior ove…
-
comment
Comment #41365344
Imaginary numbers aren't a field, so there's no such thing. Clifford algebras over the complex numbers work fine, but it's usually not what the people talking about "geometric alge…
-
comment
Comment #41364749
"Geometric algebras" are Clifford algebras over the reals. Differential geometry is probably the field where you're most likely to see mathematicians discuss them, though they also…
-
comment
Comment #41364722
There's no mathematically natural choice. In physical settings, on the other hand, you almost always want the one induced by the metric.
-
comment
Comment #41324777
Sorry, yes, typo.
-
comment
Comment #41260244
To an extent. A truly completely formal proof, as in symbol manipulation according to the rules of some formal system, no. It's valid or it isn't. But no one actually works like th…
-
comment
Comment #41260143
You're conflating a few things here. Constructivists are only interested in constructive proofs: if you want to claim "forall x in X, P(x) is true" then you need to exhibit a parti…
-
comment
Comment #41077741
> That's just a good practice in the general case: an intermediate type that fully described the data wouldn't have saved you from overwriting it unless you actually looked closely…
-
comment
Comment #41071247
> Do you have an anecdote (just one!) of a case where TypeScript's lack of type system soundness bit you on a real application? Sure. The usual Java-style variance nonsense is prob…
-
comment
Comment #41068522
There's not much connection. Typescript's record types aren't sound, but that's far from its only source of unsoundness, and sound structural typing is perfectly possible.
-
comment
Comment #41048465
Because you don't want to have to enumerate every possible combination up front. Mixins are probably the closest OO concept.