Viewing profile — nuky

Oh yeah tree-sitter it's a great foundation for semantic structure. What I'm exploring is more about what we do with that structure once someone/smth starts generating thousands of…

Agreed - that trap is very real. The open question for me is what we do when atomic, 5min readable diffs are the right goal but not realistically achievable always. My gut says we …

This is exactly the gap I'm worried about. human review still matters, but linear reading breaks down once the diff is mostly machine-generated noise. Summarizing what actually cha…

This came out of reviewing a lot of large refactors and AI-assisted changes. The goal isn't to replace code review (ofc) or relax standards, but to make the consequences of changes…

It was precisely because this was going too far that I thought the consequences of the active adoption of LLM tools could be made visible. I'm not saying LLM is completely bad—afte…

fair — that’s what I do as well)

Yeah difftastic and similar tools help a lot with formatting noise really. My question is slightly orthogonal though: even with a cleaner diff, I still find it hard to quickly tell…

That matches my experience too - tests and plans are still the backbone. What I keep running into is the step before reading tests or code: when a change is large or mechanical, I’…

Makes sense. What about latency? for typical and hard queries

Nice. And how do you handle candidates near H3 boundaries?

Sounds interesting. What's the stack under the hood?

Just to clarify - this isn’t about replacing diffs or selling a tool I ran into this problem while reviewing AI-gen refactors and started thinking about whether we’re still reviewi…

I’m wondering whether traditional diffs are becoming less suitable for AI-assisted development.. Lately I’ve been feeling frustrated during reviews when an AI generates a large num…

[dead]

[dead]

[dead]