Viewing profile — npscalar
npscalar
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 05, 2017, 2:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About npscalar
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15294107
Agreed. No contradiction. keccak.team does not say ARX is broken, only harder to analyze (and slow in HW, and getting obsoleted).
-
comment
Comment #15293169
It is however a fact that several cryptographers are moving away from ARX. Some do that for hardware efficiency (e.g., as promoted by NORX designers), some do that to better estima…
-
comment
Comment #14569386
Yes and no. After all, these are just modes using Keccak (think, say, AES-CBC, AES-GCM all use AES), so the choice depends more on the purpose than anything else. But indeed, the n…
-
comment
Comment #14541099
Blake2, modern? With the same addition/xor mixture and narrow pipe Merkel-Damgard as MD4, MD5 or SHA-1/2, it's kinda old fashioned.
-
comment
Comment #14488116
Mismatches can show an interesting property. It is likely that SHA-256 is slower than Keccak on 64-bit platforms, and that SHA-512 is slower than Keccak on 32-bit platform.
-
comment
Comment #14488102
This page has an interesting speed graph: http://kangarootwelve.org/
-
comment
Comment #14488068
And all the SHA-3-derived functions in SP 800-185. For instance, ParallelHash is super fast and a NIST standard.
-
comment
Comment #14488002
Even after 16 yrs, SHA-2 has actually not received so much cryptanalysis effort, the majorty of which comes from the same group, and the effort is further diluted into two differen…