Viewing profile — notsofastbuddy

Wildbow could be probably be monetizing a lot more than he is right now.

It's hard to tell whether you're presenting this as worse or better than the current situation.

Perhaps Tarsnap

The C&D letter mentioned in the post probably already alerted them.

> the only reason This is an extraordinary claim.

Your examples are more than 2000 years old.

A single six-episode season is going to tip the balance?

I don't know why this is downvoted, it's completely accurate. Source: [0] [0]: twitter.com/vitalikbuterin/status/1051160932699770882

Is there any public info on the numbers for Google and Apple?

There aren't very many axes along which >5% of the population actively try to improve themselves. This makes it easy to reach the top 5% if one is trying.

Exactly 0.00 can also mean that the engine has no idea what's going on.

My heuristic is that anything co-written by Gentry Lee is not worth my time.

The final reveal was mind-numbingly bad.

I think it's the prequel, A Deepness in the Sky. I thought A Fire Upon the Deep had even cooler concepts though.

They did seem to find Sandberg acceptable.

This seems orthogonal to the topic under discussion though. I don't believe GP was saying the publications are perfect.

This seems orthogonal to the parent comment.

Someone that you follow and also follows you.

Which part?

By continuing a security-first mindset that they've been establishing for decades?

Google is, after all, a company famously hurting for business and business prospects.

Food tends to have some nice micronutrients that supplements lack. There's probably nothing wrong with adding supplements to a diet that is otherwise complete.

> So, security by obscurity? Obscurity is a perfectly valid layer in a security system. It's just not sufficient as the primary security mechanism.

Manhattan has a hard natural geographic limitation. Most other parts of the city aren't nearly as bad.