Viewing profile — noogle
noogle
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 08, 2021, 11:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 126
- Public activity
- 93 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About noogle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39172549
The criticism from the second camp stems from the fact that the WHOLE job is to not drop anything. A fence with a hole is useless even if it's 99% intact. A lot of human jobs, espe…
-
comment
Comment #37218586
We need to shift from thinking of solar/wind as "electricity sources" to thinking of them as "fuel sources". The marginal cost of producing a transferrable fuel from solar/wind is …
-
comment
Comment #37025434
No. A car can cost much less than $400. Hence I own a car instead of taking taxis.
-
comment
Comment #37022696
I had the opposite experience: using taxis/Uber/Lyft was far more expensive than owning a car so after Uber stopped subsidizing rides I had to buy a vehicle. That was in a city wit…
-
comment
Comment #36594901
"prompt engineering" is a self-destructing field. If you use any rigorous approach to optimizing the prompt, you end up with essentially supervised machine -learning: models can (a…
-
comment
Comment #36066134
The government printing the fiat money that fueled a lot of this seems to be one. Besides, the "free market" is not a goal on its own. It's a method that is frequently the most ben…
-
comment
Comment #35937930
I guess for the same reason most of them keep buying from Intel - their market position allows them to pass on the cost to their customers, so it's not worth the distraction. OpenA…
-
comment
Comment #35937874
That's a broader question, but in general: it doesn't matter what I think about Nvidia's business. I could be correct all the way, but if other people disagree with me, they won't …
-
comment
Comment #35932101
It's the ecosystem - everyone else is using CUDA, so you need a very good incentive to stray away from that ecosystem. a x2-3 cost of hardware won't justify such move. The cryptoma…
-
comment
Comment #35932072
Why not? They seem to be a lot of leeway before any specific company will find it cheaper to design their own chips, or even to move to AMD (ROCm is not as well supported). Perhaps…
-
comment
Comment #35932061
Cryptocurrencies still had high barriers for entry for the public at large - not really a means of payment, and high risk as an investment. Generative AI is used by millions, has v…
-
comment
Comment #35930374
Should we buy Nvidia stock then? The greatest technological advancement in recent years critically depends on the hardware from a single company with no competition. yet Nvidia sto…
-
comment
Comment #35695480
Gas jerrycans. Either one kept at your garage for emergencies (cost: $5), or the gas station scaling horizontally by using/selling jerrycans. Haven't seen any solution for instantl…
-
comment
Comment #35682499
That's the thing about cars: their real test (or importance) is not the 90% of the time spent in the "happy path" (short, planned drives after a full night charge). It's to address…
-
comment
Comment #35681474
It's a different risk: if your novel DVD player did not work, you could just watch something else. If your novel EV doesn't charge, you may be left stranded, miss a flight or fail …
-
comment
Comment #35681131
1. Flexibility. For a rental car you need to plan ahead, pick it up on time and return it on time. Traffic jam delaying you? too bad. You now pay a surcharge. 2. Cost: the rental c…
-
comment
Comment #35681097
So the article seems to be right - wait with EVs until they improve. Why suffer the pains of an early adopter?
-
comment
Comment #35680264
The question is not whether you can make it work, but how much effort do you have to put into using an EV. Vehicles are bought to make life more convenient. To introduce constraint…
-
comment
Comment #35550193
We will have no choice. Cities need to become denser to accommodate the growing population and reduce footprint. Efficient public transportation (trams/subway) are no longer regula…
-
comment
Comment #35335581
Parents already use technology (TV, tablet computer) to alleviate some of the burden of caring for their children. Why not use a far more engaging product?
-
comment
Comment #35325460
Labor is not the only requirement for production. Resources will become the limiting factor, and their price will rise above what non-AI-owning people will be able to afford. So ba…
-
comment
Comment #35313686
Models are re-trained periodically (months, weeks, even days), and new architectures/implementations come all the time. If a better algorithm appears, practitioners will adopt a ne…
-
comment
Comment #35306034
How much of a moat is CUDA? It's indeed ages beyond any of their competitors. However, most ML/DS people interact with CUDA via a higher-level framework. In recent years this commu…
-
comment
Comment #35160378
The current (legal) answer is "unclear". There are indications that training is fine, but producing and using the generated content is questionable at least. As many IP issues, it …
-
comment
Comment #34976264
Sounds similar to Kotlin's and TypeScript's approach. The basic issue exists - how to handle unknown values. It goes beyond programming language constructs.