Viewing profile — none_for_me_thx
none_for_me_thx
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 18, 2014, 2:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About none_for_me_thx
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14963856
is it not true that you're better off poor now than rich 100 years ago? maybe the statement alone is reductive, but most of "these" articles give justification via examples, too.
-
comment
Comment #13873941
I believe the word you're looking for is technocrats.
-
comment
Comment #13872715
I encourage you to ignore the IRS, then. Or, hey, even the FCC.
-
comment
Comment #13598954
A valid contract requires consideration. It also requires an understanding, by both parties, of the terms of the contract so, no you couldn't _force_ someone into _slavery_ if they…
-
comment
Comment #13587081
I should have said I think you are operating under false assumptions, are making invalid comparisons, and are therefore drawing unwarranted conclusions. I think you might be confus…
-
comment
Comment #13586665
> in the same way that "safe" Rust is a usable (if difficult to get used to) subset of "unsafe" Rust Where did you get this idea that "safe" Rust is a subset of "unsafe" Rust? Your…
-
comment
Comment #12849630
or Keith Jarrett playing Shostakovich's Preludes and Fugues?
-
comment
Comment #11051519
Have you ever run a business?
-
comment
Comment #9168111
Government is not "industry". That word usually means "private sector". If you receive low wages in the private sector, it might be an indication that you're not providing much val…
-
comment
Comment #8843559
The Liberty Fund doesn't engage in political advocacy. They primarily (re)publish literature important to classical liberalism and the moral case for liberty (and history and law, …
-
comment
Comment #8663047
Insider trading is not fraud. If someone is merely trading based on insider knowledge (that is, they aren't also being fraudulent about it), there is no deception. A person ought t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #8633492
Are you joking?
-
comment
Comment #8624788
It wasn't clear what "accessed the profile" meant. I guess it's talking about the travel logs from 2 paragraphs above?
-
comment
Comment #8624746
There were no threats. Stop making stuff up. The comments were about "digging up dirt". Sleazy as that is, it doesn't even require personal contact.
-
comment
Comment #8624716
There was no mention of blackmail. There was no mention of revealing the location of children. There was no mention of "rifling" through the location metadata of another female jou…
-
comment
Comment #8600144
Rulers can certainly provide rules and conventions. But that is not the only, or best, place they can come from. Rules are usually emergent, and these kinds of rules are better sui…
-
comment
Comment #8599317
Anarchy => no rulers not Anarchy => no rules
-
comment
Comment #8598937
Luckily, no one trotted out that argument. Even if they had trotted it out, making wimpy appeals to the claimant's "privilege" has no bearing on whether the statement "poor people …
-
comment
Comment #8598392
Complaining about "privilege" is limp-wristed ad hominem intended to silence viewpoints you don't like, as evidenced by your refusal to take seriously zo1's points ("You should be …
-
comment
Comment #8596617
Here's the announcement from Microsoft: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/somasegar/archive/2014/11/12/opening...
-
comment
Comment #8584481
Obama doesn't care about contradictions. He's just saying whatever he knows will get him support from credulous fools. That's how it always works. Politicians don't care about you.…
-
comment
Comment #8581162
A single dimension of political ideology is ridiculous.
-
comment
Comment #8564859
In principle, the more people and companies avoid taxes the better: less revenue for states to use as collateral for their various wars and illegal projects. In practice, Luxembour…
- story