Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — nogox

nogox

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jul 31, 2014, 5:29 PM UTC
HN karma
19
Public activity
41 items

About nogox

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #15282129

    Per-minute billing makes more sense to EC2, given the reason above.

  3. comment
    Comment #15281638

    Or Azure ACI. Per-second billing doesn't add much value to EC2.

  4. comment
    Comment #15281243

    I think the per-second billing is off the point. How does it help, if the EC2 instance takes tens of seconds to launch, and tens of seconds to bootstrap? To make the most of per-se…

  5. comment
    Comment #15189996

    Try hyper.sh. They are the new Heroku for Docker.

  6. comment
    Comment #15173589

    Is it Docker Mac?

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #14978227

    5 seconds boot + per-second billing is the killer feature.

  9. story
    Ask HN: Does per-second billing make sense for GPU Instance?

    Assume that you can provision a GPU instance in EC2 in 10 seconds, and they charge you by seconds, not hours. Does this make sense to your AI/ML project? If the job takes hours or …

  10. comment
    Comment #14927786

    If you have the Docker images, try hyper.sh. The easiest and fastest way to deploy apps with Docker.

  11. comment
    Comment #14834776

    If you use Docker, try Hyper.sh

  12. comment
    Comment #14671472

    Did you try runV. It launches a Docker image into a micro VM in 100ms. github.com/hyperhq/runv

  13. story
  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #12367550

    Are you using Docker to deploy your project? If yes, check out hyper.sh. Insanely easy!

  16. comment
    Comment #12365226

    Where do you run the CI containers? AWS?

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #12311028

    That's the point. Serverless is only cost effective in low traffic cases. If you get a stable or high volume of request, a traditional server is way cheaper.

  19. comment
    Comment #12303711

    How is rancher related?

  20. comment
    Comment #12290919

    Looks very simple to deploy a few containers. Nice work!

  21. comment
    Comment #10456669

    I'm curious how scalable Hypernetes is. As it is based on K8s, will it support 1k nodes?

  22. comment
    Comment #10270827

    Check www.hyper.sh and https://github.com/hyperhq/runv They can boot a new VM with Docker images in 200ms, which is very close to LXC, and perfectly isolated by hypervisor. The pro…

  23. comment
    Comment #10058437

    Hi Solomon, It is great to hear you guys are working on that. I find Hyper is pretty interesting to run Docker on Mac https://hyper.sh/blog/post/2015/07/30/running-containers-fro..…

  24. comment
    Comment #10011161

    It also runs on Mac! https://hyper.sh/blog/post/2015/07/30/running-containers-fro...

  25. comment
    Comment #9979291

    Why? unikernel is quite opinioned imo.