Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — noclip

noclip

HN member
Joined
Tue, Feb 21, 2012, 12:09 AM UTC
HN karma
31
Public activity
19 items

About noclip

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #7581394

    It's definitely a bit surreal that even a crypto library vulnerability not only has its own web site but that the site is almost indistinguishable, like every other site launched t…

  3. comment
    Comment #7471563

    It seems from the reaction that for Facebook this wasn't just a $2 billion deal but a $3 billion deal — $2 billion in cash, plus $1 billion of Oculus' value wiped out by the announ…

  4. comment
    Comment #7433017

    There's also a possibly-not-completly-wrong table on that other TLS library's website ( http://www.gnutls.org/manual/gnutls.html#Selecting-cryptogra... ) that takes a stab at estim…

  5. comment
    Comment #7417112

    I'm curious as to what it is about Australia that makes these obscenely invasive schemes tenable to the public. It's clear that surveillance agencies in representative governments …

  6. comment
    Comment #7408155

    That, or slap the affiliate ID for Twitter on the URL.

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #7287462

    If you pay for (say) a DS3 line, there's an implicit assumption that you are not going to be pumping 44.736 Mbit/s through it 24/7. Whoa, whoa, whoa. This is exactly the assumption…

  9. comment
    Comment #7280835

    The s_client connection continues but should still report a verify error. On Linux: http://pastebin.com/QWpSrR5p

  10. comment
    Comment #7280368

    Except it isn't failing.

  11. comment
    Comment #7280293

    It's not just cURL. It's much bigger, and much worse. http://pastebin.com/Yb6pUvr6

  12. comment
    Comment #7225692

    What's more puzzling than the flagrant absurdity of this is why the people involved are content to waste their lives creating these things.

  13. comment
    Comment #7008611

    ICANN charges 22 cents per domain. What would you propose the price be lowered to?

  14. comment
    Comment #6997836

    You mean to say a company that encrypts users' messages in ECB mode with a fixed key hard-coded into the binary and which was publicly disclosed almost a year ago and hasn't been c…

  15. comment
  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #6864432

    Then there's this: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/looting-the-pensio...

  18. comment
    Comment #6757883

    In case anyone is still curious, part of the encrypted data in those blobs is almost certainly the entire HTTP request sent by the client. A tiny GET with just a Host: header gener…

  19. comment
    Comment #3614533

    Why even bother breaking the crypto? They say right on the site that they use HTTP for public key retrieval so a MITM would simply serve up bogus public keys to the clients.