Viewing profile — nobody42
nobody42
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 04, 2024, 7:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 28
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nobody42
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49126904
It's just entropy. Favorable environment of Linux distros is an initial phase of technology. This state is gone for years now, AI is just making it evident. Adapt or become obsolet…
-
comment
Comment #48859153
It's usable (?) as a toy: numerous gui inconsistencies and lack of security isolation [0]. Can't say whether the of lack funding (move to Cockpit from Red Hat) is the reason, or ma…
-
comment
Comment #48831604
Is this some kind of FUD? Shady sponsors (if there is any) doesn't matter when transparency is in place. Want to reveal malicious intent? Provide a PoC. Only hardware that supports…
-
comment
Comment #48816558
"There's no life where data broker isn't needed"
-
comment
Comment #48816437
Every time GrapheneOS "just works" should be mentioned, because some ecosystems are straight hostile to user-controlled systems.
-
comment
Comment #48810664
Its a renderer. It bakes live OSM data once very few weeks.
-
comment
Comment #48618778
Because exposed, non-private, abused by-default is a business model. The company is incentivised to not provide restricted access - otherwise you can't have a cut from apps revenue…
-
comment
Comment #48618518
Outdated, but gives the general idea: https://github.com/nandan-desai-extras/PrivacyBreacher
-
comment
Comment #48142102
Memory safety is good, but does not protect from every threat. In this day and age infrastructure operators should familiarize themselves with proactive defenses, MAC: SElinux and …
-
comment
Comment #46069909
Attack surface of this thing gives me existential dread.
-
comment
Comment #46024913
> Freexian aims to keep the updates available for individual users and non-profit organizations.
-
comment
Comment #46018468
Best among existing. Anti-fingerprinting field is still in it's early stages. I wouldn't say Tor Browser is the best because it requires custom configuration to be usable convenien…
-
comment
Comment #46018219
You could test with this: https://github.com/abrahamjuliot/creepjs Does it store the data? Unknown. The best browser for protection is https://mullvad.net/en/browser because it mak…
-
comment
Comment #45993038
pmOS device compatibility matrix: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Devices
-
comment
Comment #44488883
Therapy booth from 1971: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YkPnwoYyE
-
comment
Comment #44119452
Isn't owned by advertising company. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startpage#Merger_and_recent_hi...
-
comment
Comment #43958452
http://youmightnotneedjs.com
-
comment
Comment #42950174
Same. I sighed when they continued to run telemetry after disabling it - I blocked it (don't care if it's a dry run or not). Bit the bullet when they discontinued FF/TB in favor of…
-
comment
Comment #42949602
Updates are a necessity, and they don't have to be feature-breaking. More distributions need to adopt security-only channels.
-
comment
Comment #41450480
I'm trying to solve the lack of tools for AppArmor profile composition: https://github.com/nobody43/apparmor-suggest
-
comment
Comment #41450389
It's a symptom. Seems that label-based MAC is too tightly coupled with other parts of the system. With path-based, there's no need to disable it (entirely) because each part have t…
-
comment
Comment #41449977
AppArmor is not less restrictive, it's less fine-grained, at the current stage of development at least.