Viewing profile — no-dr-onboard
no-dr-onboard
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 2:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,507
- Public activity
- 417 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About no-dr-onboard
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47183011
I normally don't respond to bad faith responses like this, but I found the following quote pretty funny: > Even if I grant moral objectivity, I reject that you have epistemic acces…
-
comment
Comment #47176566
A lot of your argument presupposes a distinct lack of parental authority in the education of a child. The way that it appears to be playing out is that parents were repulsed by per…
-
comment
Comment #47176526
Not op, but GitLab fits the form.
-
comment
Comment #47176515
That’s a good question. Assuming a righteous and just government: The government couldn’t justify the killing of innocent civilians. The government couldn’t justify the killing of …
-
comment
Comment #47175532
The government has a responsibility to protect its constituents. Sometimes that requires collaboration. This isn’t hard.
-
comment
Comment #47175501
Your argument makes sense to me and changed my mind. Thank you.
-
comment
Comment #47159930
A lot of these are actually grandfathered in. Vulcanization, electrolysis, auto painting, etc. I think the emphasis is that CA has effectively made it difficult to get regulatory a…
-
comment
Comment #47159907
Maybe reworded as “He has skin in the game” > so obviously his point can’t be true > so obviously he’s biased and we can’t do the mental work of sifting > so obviously I can dismis…
-
comment
Comment #47159873
“Yes you can” misses the point. But you’ll incur heavy taxes, huge COB increases, tightening regulatory scrutiny and all for nothing compared to being just one or two states over. …
-
comment
Comment #46786051
(plot twist: he works for NSA contractors)
-
comment
Comment #46737473
Just saw this. Hope you feel better. It seems you were really going through it when you wrote this.
-
comment
Comment #46652145
I'm a principal at a non-fang company. Throughout my tenure however, I've worked at roughly half of the FAANG companies back when people thought of them as synonymous with excellen…
-
comment
Comment #46651903
Toobin had many words. Most of them were onomatopoeias.
-
comment
Comment #46639507
You know, I think you're right. I recant what I said earlier. I actually don't think I should care about this matter at all. In a more general sense, it seems best to me that peopl…
-
comment
Comment #46637504
I don't think I would ever "have blood on my hands" in my current position as a software developer because Gotham and Foundry have valid and real world use cases that are being imp…
-
comment
Comment #46634939
I'd like to invite you to prove any three of your points.
-
comment
Comment #46634709
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46634688
That's a pretty broad generalization, but OK I'll bite. - I think Yarvin has a lot of good points. No one should be ashamed to admit the truth of a matter. I can't stand his voice,…
-
comment
Comment #46617835
> sparkfun chose to publish a vague public accusation. once you do that, speculation is inevitable. Ok sure, but the explanation provided strikes me as equally vague. I don't think…
-
comment
Comment #46617713
Yeah this is how I read it as well.
-
comment
Comment #43825875
I see this quite a bit with Rust. I honestly cringe when people get up in arms about someone taking their project out of the rust community. The same can be said of books as of pro…
-
comment
Comment #43637366
"Why do you think individuals deserve universal basic income?"
-
comment
Comment #43617025
100% reproducible? That's amazing. I'll be honest, I don't really believe you (which I suppose is the point, right?). Do you all document how you got around system level sources of…
-
comment
Comment #43616913
Hm, it turns out suggesting that someone buy a suit for a job they need is a litmus test.
-
comment
Comment #43616908
> Literally the only thing on the client could be a session cookie. You know, about 7 years ago I would have heartily agreed with you. KISS, right? The thing is, it just doesn't ma…