Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — nk_kolja

nk_kolja

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 12:57 PM UTC
HN karma
161
Public activity
27 items

About nk_kolja

kolja.rs

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49385836

    What a nice comment. Indeed, it feels like it was just waiting for you to find it. That is a rather nice ritual, I think I will use it now to motivate myself to learn Scala.

  2. comment
    Comment #49373410

    Nice! And what a beautiful website! Below the surface it's all the division with constant trick.

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #49366742

    I doubt it would have unlooped itself from re-counting the steps in Program D and calculating the complexity of the algorithm. I couldn't get it to do it with a weeks worth of Clau…

  5. comment
    Comment #49366708

    I'm happy to see someone commenting on Knuth's note. Don't worry, you probably won't need to correct anything unless you have a computer with an odd radix :)

  6. comment
    Comment #49366703

    It probably wouldn't help, and TAOCP from the beginning is too many pages. It would help to read the division algorithm chapter. I introduce my own notation from medium->small divi…

  7. comment
    Comment #49366641

    You are absolutely right. My mistake, the MIX computed the trial quotient in step 043 in a saturated way (which was enough to control the bug, thus my comment). It does indeed loop…

  8. comment
    Comment #49366371

    What a lovely story

  9. comment
    Comment #49366337

    Thank you!

  10. comment
    Comment #49366291

    Thank you, i'm flattered!

  11. comment
    Comment #49366185

    Thank you! Honestly, while waiting for the check I wondered what it would be, and 0x$1.00 feels just right. The name in the book came unexpectedly, it's really a reward on its own.…

  12. comment
    Comment #49365978

    Thank you! Indeed it's the infamous Step D3. In my opinion, with the new changes and the new Theorem B, this step will feel more natural, because it's essentially extending the 2/1…

  13. comment
    Comment #49365962

    I beg to differ. A loop would also call for additional run-time analysis. And Knuth changed Step D3, if it were a loop he wouldn't have had to. Additionally, there is no loop in Pr…

  14. comment
    Comment #49361575

    Thank you for letting me now, but I cannot replicate the issue on Firefox. There are some issues with math and the animations not breaking on mobile, which I am working on repairin…

  15. comment
    Comment #49361514

    It can still be cashed in, though not in any bank, you need to contact Knuth beforehand. For me it will stay framed on the wall.

  16. comment
    Comment #49360116

    I was looking forward to uninstalling that forsaken app.

  17. comment
    Comment #49286259

    I found a bug in Algorithm D, the long division algorithm in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming". It was discussed on HN a couple of times https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i…

  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #33608726

    How are we going to encrypt that?

  20. comment
    Comment #33600248

    The linked article mentions the Riemann hypothesis, but the author claims to have proven the Landau-Siegel conjecture https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03689-2 , which is …

  21. comment
    Comment #32857178

    What's Figma?

  22. comment
    Comment #29363715

    I'm surprised that people consider this worthy of begin published on a semi-serious blog post https://www.poshenloh.com/quadratic/ .

  23. comment
    Comment #29359175

    right click > copy image > paste somewhere Works for me :) (I pasted in Telegram FYI)

  24. comment
    Comment #26991194

    Apart from Omega's and FINA's statements that Cavic touched first, but Phelps was the first to trigger the mechanism with enough force, you can find the photos here https://static0…

  25. comment
    Comment #26980373

    Regarding the swimming issue, there is no underwater photo at the website which you linked, but one can google it, and it clearly shows that Phelps came in second. Arguments were m…