Viewing profile — nk_kolja
nk_kolja
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 12:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 161
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nk_kolja
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49385836
What a nice comment. Indeed, it feels like it was just waiting for you to find it. That is a rather nice ritual, I think I will use it now to motivate myself to learn Scala.
-
comment
Comment #49373410
Nice! And what a beautiful website! Below the surface it's all the division with constant trick.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49366742
I doubt it would have unlooped itself from re-counting the steps in Program D and calculating the complexity of the algorithm. I couldn't get it to do it with a weeks worth of Clau…
-
comment
Comment #49366708
I'm happy to see someone commenting on Knuth's note. Don't worry, you probably won't need to correct anything unless you have a computer with an odd radix :)
-
comment
Comment #49366703
It probably wouldn't help, and TAOCP from the beginning is too many pages. It would help to read the division algorithm chapter. I introduce my own notation from medium->small divi…
-
comment
Comment #49366641
You are absolutely right. My mistake, the MIX computed the trial quotient in step 043 in a saturated way (which was enough to control the bug, thus my comment). It does indeed loop…
-
comment
Comment #49366371
What a lovely story
-
comment
Comment #49366337
Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #49366291
Thank you, i'm flattered!
-
comment
Comment #49366185
Thank you! Honestly, while waiting for the check I wondered what it would be, and 0x$1.00 feels just right. The name in the book came unexpectedly, it's really a reward on its own.…
-
comment
Comment #49365978
Thank you! Indeed it's the infamous Step D3. In my opinion, with the new changes and the new Theorem B, this step will feel more natural, because it's essentially extending the 2/1…
-
comment
Comment #49365962
I beg to differ. A loop would also call for additional run-time analysis. And Knuth changed Step D3, if it were a loop he wouldn't have had to. Additionally, there is no loop in Pr…
-
comment
Comment #49361575
Thank you for letting me now, but I cannot replicate the issue on Firefox. There are some issues with math and the animations not breaking on mobile, which I am working on repairin…
-
comment
Comment #49361514
It can still be cashed in, though not in any bank, you need to contact Knuth beforehand. For me it will stay framed on the wall.
-
comment
Comment #49360116
I was looking forward to uninstalling that forsaken app.
-
comment
Comment #49286259
I found a bug in Algorithm D, the long division algorithm in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming". It was discussed on HN a couple of times https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i…
- story
-
comment
Comment #33608726
How are we going to encrypt that?
-
comment
Comment #33600248
The linked article mentions the Riemann hypothesis, but the author claims to have proven the Landau-Siegel conjecture https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03689-2 , which is …
-
comment
Comment #32857178
What's Figma?
-
comment
Comment #29363715
I'm surprised that people consider this worthy of begin published on a semi-serious blog post https://www.poshenloh.com/quadratic/ .
-
comment
Comment #29359175
right click > copy image > paste somewhere Works for me :) (I pasted in Telegram FYI)
-
comment
Comment #26991194
Apart from Omega's and FINA's statements that Cavic touched first, but Phelps was the first to trigger the mechanism with enough force, you can find the photos here https://static0…
-
comment
Comment #26980373
Regarding the swimming issue, there is no underwater photo at the website which you linked, but one can google it, and it clearly shows that Phelps came in second. Arguments were m…