Viewing profile — nirga
nirga
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 5:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 217
- Public activity
- 85 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nirga
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #45967556
Hey! We don’t support an otel collector directly - you have to connect it to some backend. Minimal one can be jaeger for example
-
comment
Comment #43448935
Sorry didn’t know that. It’s not my article so didn’t want to attribute the title to myself
-
comment
Comment #43448931
For example - the fact that the FE environment variables are hardcoded at build time makes it hard to just deploy a container
- story
-
comment
Comment #41008500
I think that's the key benefit of using OpenTelemetry - it's pretty efficient and the performance footprint is negligible.
-
comment
Comment #40994866
Thanks for spotting those! We'll fix it asap
-
comment
Comment #40994795
I think you can (pretty) easily set this up with an otel collector and something that replays data from S3 - there's a native implementation that converts otel to clickhouse
-
comment
Comment #40994019
You can do it and it's a good way of doing that - from our experiments that can catch most errors. You don't even need to use different models - even using the same model (I don't …
-
comment
Comment #40993081
Thanks! It can vary greatly between use cases - but we've seen extremely high detection rates for tagged texts (>95%). When switching to production, this gets trickier since you do…
-
comment
Comment #40993030
You're right. We faced those same issues. So we plan to move those prompts and completions to be sent as log events with some reference to the trace/span and not actually on the sp…
-
comment
Comment #40990095
Thanks! I wasn’t offended or anything, don’t get the wrong impression. What strikes me odd is the fact that an AI that checks AI is an issue. Because AI can mean a lot of things - …
-
comment
Comment #40989693
It has the same logic of saying you dont want to use a computer to monitor or test your code since it will mean that a computer will monitor a computer. AI is a broad term, I agree…
-
comment
Comment #40989464
I replied to you in a different thread, I don't think calling our companies "deceptive" will help you or me get anywhere. While I agree with you that detection will never be hermet…
-
comment
Comment #40989223
I'm sorry but this is not what we do. We don't use LLMs to grade your LLM calls.
-
comment
Comment #40989217
I think that LLMs are hallucinating by design. I'm not sure we'll ever get to a 0% hallucinations and we should be ok with it (at least for the next coming years?). So getting an a…
-
comment
Comment #40989197
I think it depends on the use case and how you define hallucinations. We've seen our metrics perform well (=correlates with human feedback) for use cases like summarization, RAG qu…
-
comment
Comment #40987622
Ping me over slack (traceloop.com/slack) or email nir at traceloop dot com
-
comment
Comment #40987613
roger that! I like them though (am I a normie then?)
-
comment
Comment #40987509
I tend to find classic NLP metric more predictable and stable than "LLM as a judge" metrics so I'd try to see if you rely on them more. We've written a couple of blog posts about s…
-
comment
Comment #40987356
We trained our own models for some of them, and we combined some well known NLP metrics (like Gruen [1]) to make this work. You're right that it's hard to figure out how to "trust"…