Viewing profile — nijave

Currently using exa/searxng/scrapling with pretty good success. Has anyone compared these to agent research?

It has real business value. Letting non technical users run wild without the onerous layers of controls in traditional enterprise IT. We're already contending with users wanting to…

>This doesn't work in the cloud Software-as-a-Service model, because you are not running your own copy of the app. Let me introduce you to scrapling+MCP--the closest I've come. Ste…

n8n will do that

I think you tend to need both. There's certain deterministic data and steps that surround the agent as well as certain agentic steps where the LLM is controlling the execution flow…

There's an env var you can set to tell it when to compact. It's especially helpful for models with big context that lose coherence much earlier.

On Claude Code you can run /context and it'll explain everything

How do you ensure your SQL queries (either raw or ORM generated) retrieve the correct data? A lot of business apps are mostly SQL with a thin layer of glue to integrate everything.…

Django has built in support for templates https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/6.0/ref/databases/#test-da... I thought it had a way to do concurrent sharded tests on the same database…

To add to what the other person said, they're also loaded differently than arbitrary docs. They're presented as a list of titles and descriptions to the LLM and it can pick which o…

If there's 1 developer working on 1 branch at a time: main is at commit A, you branch add B and C, you merge now main is at A, B, C. Your "integration" was just moving the code for…

Opportunity cost

If you can modify role IAM, I'd start with SSM Parameter Store + KMS encryption for secret values. That is generally much cheaper since typical use fits in the free tier. They also…

>Can't you run your CI locally? If you mean automated tests and linters, sure. Conceptually continuous integration is generally integrating 2+ different lineages of code together w…

>So, if software knows in advance which data chunk (expert) it'll need for the next token, it can load that in parallel with computing current token. Yeah, I was thinking MADV_WILL…

Iirc there are no release tags, they build off the tip of the branch Actually it's their zmk fork, not qmk https://github.com/Keychron/zmk/tree/rtl8762g

Any idea if madvise helps? Admittedly I have very limited experience and only on Linux

Hopefully better than their QMK fork. They force push over their branch in their fork each new release effectively erasing history of the last version... Of course there's no chang…

>does this mean Microsoft's model is best at fixing Microsoft products In theory, they have tons of network-type data and at least some Linux data from Azure. In practice... Good q…

I should have mentioned Claude Code, specifically. It sounds like other harnesses are better. I'm a bit entrenched with CC at this point since that's what we have a subscription to…

Forgot about the ol "but how many tokens did you spend to get _there_"--wish benchmarks would include the number of input/output tokens to achieve the score. I think the closest is…

Anthropic has an outage nearly everyday. GitHub seems like they're down to about once a month again

I wish the harnesses would auto resume but I suppose that would also add more load without more money for subscription customers...

1000ms / 12 = 83ms per request which sounds normal

I think on swebench verified luna was only like 3% points lower for 1/5 the cost Like 96% vs 93% or something