Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — nighthawk454

nighthawk454

HN member
Joined
Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 11:26 PM UTC
HN karma
1,334
Public activity
424 items

About nighthawk454

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49130133

    Ah good point, no udp. I was looking at webtorrent but it does share the same limitation, unless you’re on the nodejs (non-browser) version. Looking forward to trying bitbang! Seem…

  2. comment
    Comment #49127452

    > it still needs to bootstrap the connection via central server. I think that always might be a limitation of P2P I think Iroh has a way of doing it using either DNS or BitTorrent …

  3. comment
    Comment #49101486

    You can add a library view! Checkout this Bookshelf plugin: https://github.com/AndyHazz/bookshelf.koplugin

  4. comment
    Comment #48788864

    This tracks with what I’ve heard around as well. What changed in the financial instruments? My understanding is a lot of the loans have gone PIK or otherwise essentially aren’t ser…

  5. comment
    Comment #48782836

    Some potentially related stuff on the topic: Anisotropy in word embeddings dates back to at least 2017 with word2vec - where there were zero layers. The cone-shaped anisotropy in t…

  6. comment
    Comment #48634919

    > Greenbacks … a form of fiat money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money)

  7. comment
    Comment #48500937

    Ah, I hadn’t thought about the generational aspect that’s interesting. The aesthetic totally makes sense to me when the music is intended for it / designed with it in mind, which I…

  8. comment
    Comment #48498193

    > 1 … they will often chose the more compressed/louder one I’ve always been curious - but presumably that’s true even after volume matching? > 3 Compressed sound works better in no…

  9. comment
    Comment #48498128

    ReplayGain is nice - but note it doesn’t ’fix the compression’. Compression and dynamic range is about loud/quiet _within_ the track. ReplayGain just turns the volume up and down f…

  10. comment
    Comment #48497928

    It really does on some records, if you’re interested check out some comparisons on YouTube. Many times it’s subtle eq tweaks, granted, and that won’t much matter. But a lot of olde…

  11. comment
    Comment #48494914

    It’s completely true, when the vinyl has a different mastering. It can be a completely different version. It’s not because it’s vinyl

  12. comment
    Comment #48494886

    Short answer, no not really. It won’t ever be as good as a proper uncompressed mastering

  13. comment
    Comment #48482460

    And also all the days you don’t, so, by itself not very meaningful. Especially since you can’t tell which one is right in advance. In some sense, so does a calendar

  14. comment
    Comment #48165467

    I’m running MultiScrobbler to scrobble from multiple sources (Spotify/PlexAmp) to multiple sinks (Last.fm/ListenBrainz/Maloja). Looks like they already support writing to Rocksky! …

  15. comment
    Comment #47607357

    They are, but SpaceX is trying to get rules changed. They want the index to buy at a multiple of the float, so they release say 5% but get bought as if they had released 15% float.…

  16. comment
    Comment #47595084

    It has plenty of useful control plane features out of the box. Nothing much you _couldn’t_ do yourself but you don’t have to. Or with Headscale as the self-hosted open-source versi…

  17. comment
    Comment #47595063

    Great system! I wonder what the overall usage distribution is like - presumably some kind of power law shape.

  18. comment
    Comment #47559934

    Yeah, that’s the idea. The loans get bundled up and resold to insurance companies, pension funds, and retail bond investors. Funds are plenty willing to lend other peoples money to…

  19. comment
    Comment #47404910

    Ah, I re-read my original comment with that in mind, and I see how it can go a few directions depending on the context - thanks!

  20. comment
    Comment #47395843

    QQQ is not in isolation. It’s just a bundle of stocks. Rebalancing that will affect the prices of its constituent stocks, which include some of the highest market cap stocks. Those…

  21. comment
    Comment #47395690

    I don’t see that in the article. The only thing I see is about S&P is where they mention that the S&P 500’s rules would prevent this manipulation if SpaceX were added to that index…

  22. comment
    Comment #47395665

    What?! This absolutely affects more than Nasdaq 100 / QQQ. The index is just a function of the stocks. It only moves if the underlying stocks move. Rebalancing Nasdaq will cause se…

  23. comment
    Comment #47395198

    It's worse than that, because S&P500 and Nasdaq100 share stocks. Like all of the MAG7 stocks. So if mag7 stocks dip because they're being structurally sold to buy SpaceX, then the …

  24. comment
    Comment #47395145

    Yeah, but the S&P500 is hugely concentrated in MAG7, which are all Nasdaq listed. So when they all get sold to buy SpaceX, you can bet your butt something's gonna happen to a S&P50…

  25. comment
    Comment #47395138

    There's trillions of dollars sitting in indexes that are quite literally 'passively' invested. Virtually everything holds this bundle in one way or another. Passive indexing has bo…