Viewing profile — nighthawk454
nighthawk454
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 11:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,334
- Public activity
- 424 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nighthawk454
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49130133
Ah good point, no udp. I was looking at webtorrent but it does share the same limitation, unless you’re on the nodejs (non-browser) version. Looking forward to trying bitbang! Seem…
-
comment
Comment #49127452
> it still needs to bootstrap the connection via central server. I think that always might be a limitation of P2P I think Iroh has a way of doing it using either DNS or BitTorrent …
-
comment
Comment #49101486
You can add a library view! Checkout this Bookshelf plugin: https://github.com/AndyHazz/bookshelf.koplugin
-
comment
Comment #48788864
This tracks with what I’ve heard around as well. What changed in the financial instruments? My understanding is a lot of the loans have gone PIK or otherwise essentially aren’t ser…
-
comment
Comment #48782836
Some potentially related stuff on the topic: Anisotropy in word embeddings dates back to at least 2017 with word2vec - where there were zero layers. The cone-shaped anisotropy in t…
-
comment
Comment #48634919
> Greenbacks … a form of fiat money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money)
-
comment
Comment #48500937
Ah, I hadn’t thought about the generational aspect that’s interesting. The aesthetic totally makes sense to me when the music is intended for it / designed with it in mind, which I…
-
comment
Comment #48498193
> 1 … they will often chose the more compressed/louder one I’ve always been curious - but presumably that’s true even after volume matching? > 3 Compressed sound works better in no…
-
comment
Comment #48498128
ReplayGain is nice - but note it doesn’t ’fix the compression’. Compression and dynamic range is about loud/quiet _within_ the track. ReplayGain just turns the volume up and down f…
-
comment
Comment #48497928
It really does on some records, if you’re interested check out some comparisons on YouTube. Many times it’s subtle eq tweaks, granted, and that won’t much matter. But a lot of olde…
-
comment
Comment #48494914
It’s completely true, when the vinyl has a different mastering. It can be a completely different version. It’s not because it’s vinyl
-
comment
Comment #48494886
Short answer, no not really. It won’t ever be as good as a proper uncompressed mastering
-
comment
Comment #48482460
And also all the days you don’t, so, by itself not very meaningful. Especially since you can’t tell which one is right in advance. In some sense, so does a calendar
-
comment
Comment #48165467
I’m running MultiScrobbler to scrobble from multiple sources (Spotify/PlexAmp) to multiple sinks (Last.fm/ListenBrainz/Maloja). Looks like they already support writing to Rocksky! …
-
comment
Comment #47607357
They are, but SpaceX is trying to get rules changed. They want the index to buy at a multiple of the float, so they release say 5% but get bought as if they had released 15% float.…
-
comment
Comment #47595084
It has plenty of useful control plane features out of the box. Nothing much you _couldn’t_ do yourself but you don’t have to. Or with Headscale as the self-hosted open-source versi…
-
comment
Comment #47595063
Great system! I wonder what the overall usage distribution is like - presumably some kind of power law shape.
-
comment
Comment #47559934
Yeah, that’s the idea. The loans get bundled up and resold to insurance companies, pension funds, and retail bond investors. Funds are plenty willing to lend other peoples money to…
-
comment
Comment #47404910
Ah, I re-read my original comment with that in mind, and I see how it can go a few directions depending on the context - thanks!
-
comment
Comment #47395843
QQQ is not in isolation. It’s just a bundle of stocks. Rebalancing that will affect the prices of its constituent stocks, which include some of the highest market cap stocks. Those…
-
comment
Comment #47395690
I don’t see that in the article. The only thing I see is about S&P is where they mention that the S&P 500’s rules would prevent this manipulation if SpaceX were added to that index…
-
comment
Comment #47395665
What?! This absolutely affects more than Nasdaq 100 / QQQ. The index is just a function of the stocks. It only moves if the underlying stocks move. Rebalancing Nasdaq will cause se…
-
comment
Comment #47395198
It's worse than that, because S&P500 and Nasdaq100 share stocks. Like all of the MAG7 stocks. So if mag7 stocks dip because they're being structurally sold to buy SpaceX, then the …
-
comment
Comment #47395145
Yeah, but the S&P500 is hugely concentrated in MAG7, which are all Nasdaq listed. So when they all get sold to buy SpaceX, you can bet your butt something's gonna happen to a S&P50…
-
comment
Comment #47395138
There's trillions of dollars sitting in indexes that are quite literally 'passively' invested. Virtually everything holds this bundle in one way or another. Passive indexing has bo…