Viewing profile — nielstron
nielstron
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 10, 2023, 7:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 48
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nielstron
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #47050174
Yes that's a great summary and I agree broadly. Note with different prompt types I refer to different types of meta-prompts to generate the AGENTS.md. All of these are quite useles…
-
comment
Comment #47050160
It could... but as pointed out by other the significance is unclear and per-model results have even less samples than the benchmark average. So: maybe :)
-
comment
Comment #47045565
Hey thanks for your review, a paper author here. Regarding the 4% improvement for human written AGENTS.md: this would be huge indeed if it were a _consistent_ improvement. However,…
-
comment
Comment #47044555
This is life of an LLM researcher. We literally ran the last experiments only a month ago on what were the latest models back then...
-
comment
Comment #47044540
Exactly my thoughts... the model should just auto ingest README and CONTRIBUTING when started.
-
comment
Comment #47044517
Hey, paper author here. We did try to get an even sample - we include both SWE-bench repos (which are large, popular and mostly human-written) and a sample of smaller, more recent …
-
comment
Comment #47044493
Hey, a paper author here :) I agree, if you know well about LLMs it shouldn't be too surprising that autogenerated context files are not helping - yet this is the default recommend…
- story
-
comment
Comment #45231514
Debunking the Claims of K2-Think https://www.sri.inf.ethz.ch/blog/k2think
-
comment
Comment #45231512
Debunking the Claims of K2-Think https://www.sri.inf.ethz.ch/blog/k2think
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #43983472
noted. we'll make sure to critizise turing complete type systems more thoroughly next time :))
-
comment
Comment #43982257
Yes this work is super cool too! Note that LSPs can not guarantee resolving the necessary types that we use to ensure the prefix property, which we leverage to avoid backtracking a…
-
comment
Comment #43981409
thank you!
-
comment
Comment #43981397
re detecting and switching language: you could run several constraint systems in parallel and switch as soon as one of them rejects the input and another accepts it re backtracking…
-
comment
Comment #43981374
the problem with LSPs is that they don't guarantee generating a type annotation that we can use for constraints, i.e. we can not ensure the prefix property using LSPs. so we had to…
-
comment
Comment #43981362
The downside is that you need to properly preprocess code, have less non-code Training Data, and can not adapt easily to new programming languages
-
comment
Comment #43981352
we were thinking about doing exactly this, the closest current work is probably the amazing "Learning Formal Mathematics from Intrinsic Motivation" by Poesia et al (they use constr…