Viewing profile — nickodell
nickodell
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 14, 2013, 4:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 686
- Public activity
- 266 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nickodell
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27431676
Are non-sequiturs always malicious? For example, suppose you have a news site, and it has a story about Ukraine, followed by a story about school shootings. Even if two links next …
-
comment
Comment #26975106
Alex Oh worked for a law firm which represents Exxon. That law firm was accused of obstructing a deposition to avoid providing answers to the other side. [1] >ORDERS defense counse…
-
comment
Comment #26085092
Stingrays are more useful as an investigative tool than an evidentiary tool. DNA is the other way around.
-
comment
Comment #26085074
Believe it or not, I was already aware of all of those things, having followed a number of criminal defense blogs. If you read the article and appellate decision which is linked, i…
-
comment
Comment #26069207
>taking the life of an innocent The prosecutor isn't unilaterally deciding whether the DNA evidence is valid. There will be a public hearing where both the prosecution and defense …
-
comment
Comment #26066537
>My prediction: this firm will probably try to get removed from the case, rather than open source their shitty code. That isn't necessarily their choice. The prosecutors will make …
-
comment
Comment #25949169
Why couldn't you attach to the screen, press Ctrl-C, then press up arrow to get the original command?
-
comment
Comment #25879350
That's a thoughtful answer; thank you.
-
comment
Comment #25876587
>First, the client makes an unauthenticated request to the server to retrieve the password salts associated with the username. If no user is found, an error is returned to the clie…
-
comment
Comment #25757203
I was looking for a more technical response. e.g. How are new blocks created? Proof of work, predefined functionaries, something else? You say you have SPV proofs which allow a ful…
-
comment
Comment #25750984
How does your service differ from NameCoin?
-
comment
Comment #25318685
The article also suggests that COVID was maybe an inside job, and that it's unpatriotic to follow health restrictions. (Not in exactly those words, but it warns about "acquiescing"…
-
comment
Comment #25230199
Apple says they're going to move to an HTTPS based system, so the relevant comparison is between HTTPS and DNS, not HTTP and DNS.
-
comment
Comment #25215421
Then the question is, "how much do I trust my ISP/DNS provider?" Those DNS lookups tell your ISP 1) that you use a mac and 2) that you have an application from a specific developer…
-
comment
Comment #25041166
So what happens if a removed function is called? Or can you guarantee that won't happen?
-
comment
Comment #24014814
Note that minority shareholders have some rights, though this varies by state of incorporation: (PDF warning) https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=F20...
-
comment
Comment #23670557
It's 90 days, and they renew it when there are 30 days left.
-
comment
Comment #23436890
This doesn't seem to work that well. If you type invalid syntax, like '.[' then the window suddenly resizes to accomodate the error message, but not all of the text boxes resize. j…
-
comment
Comment #22969767
>It's therefore trivial to have both protocols coexist, even on the same UDP port, without any negotiation whatsoever. You simply need to discard packets that don't decrypt, which …
-
comment
Comment #22962703
>In contrast, a hypothetical WireGuard protocol v2 can offer just two suites, the old one and the new one, with simple advice: use the new one if you can, and allow the old one for…
-
comment
Comment #22872355
Under C11, the compiler is still allowed to assume termination of a loop if the controlling expression is non-constant and a few other conditions are met. https://stackoverflow.com…
-
comment
Comment #22740401
That unprivileged user will not have the SSH host key, which will create a warning for any user who connects, just as though someone had conducted a man-in-the-middle attack. Of co…
-
comment
Comment #22642146
Here's the vulnerability: var total = ""; for (var i = 0; i
-
comment
Comment #22515034
That's a very good point, and thank you for correcting me.
-
comment
Comment #22510013
Is it really possible to remove the side channels? Even if you formally prove that it does not access memory outside of authorized regions, that doesn't prevent it from speculative…