Viewing profile — nickbw
nickbw
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 30, 2007, 1:49 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 55
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nickbw
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #2900760
Hehe. Sorry, that came across more accusatory than I intended. I totally agree with your overall point. I think Twitter's follower numbers are an example of gamification done right…
-
comment
Comment #2900401
> Twitter doesn’t have game mechanics ... > You should totally follow me on Twitter Yuh-huh. I think Twitter is genuinely useful, but I'm pretty sure scoring Big Numbers is the dri…
-
comment
Comment #2800789
Ditto. I've always had the impression that, at least on HN, "weekend project" describes a level of "seriousness" rather than absolute time invested. It lets readers know what kind …
-
comment
Comment #2791864
Thanks, I hadn't seen that one before. :) Yeah, it's a similar concept, as is http://mlkshk.com/ with their new bookmarklet. I think two things set imagestash apart: 1. The bookmar…
-
comment
Comment #2791271
Clickable: http://imagestash.org/
-
story
Show HN: my weekend project, Imagestash - a bookmarklet+ for image collectors
http://imagestash.org/ Kind of like Instapaper for images. While surfing at home one evening I found the perfect desktop background ... for my work machine. I got to pondering the …
-
comment
Comment #1901876
I think this is the salient point for startups. Painfully contrived "fun" can be a short-term win. Tech press and early adopters like it ... but only because they like being clever…
-
comment
Comment #1710050
Animal Planet shows animal faces. Anything with a recognizable mouth and set of eyes is still pretty engaging to our wetware. (In fact, I just tried "Animal Planet" on Google image…
-
comment
Comment #1703719
For brand new/"experimental" projects with both user permissions and a non-trivial set of features, built by a small team, I've always found it easiest to work like this: 1. Build …
-
comment
Comment #1416442
Thank you for the insightful comments, and for taking the time to read the code! I really appreciate it. I've added a pseudo-random component to the nonce, and a MAC to the message…
-
comment
Comment #1412952
I appreciate your concern, Thomas, but you seem to be telling me that: 1. no one will be able to gauge the integrity of a web app by reviewing the code, and 2. I should fix the sec…
-
comment
Comment #1412730
Actually I really appreciate Weis' comments, because they're actual concrete problems and implementable solutions. (A bit-flipping attack is not particularly interesting by itself,…
-
comment
Comment #1412607
Most web security systems don't even give you the option. You sends your data off and you trusts your server. You can't read the code at all because it lives on a box you don't hav…
-
comment
Comment #1412394
Heehee. Nice!
-
comment
Comment #1412213
If you would like to propose improved crypto code, I would love it . Honestly. But "javascript is a messy language" is not inherently an attack. You can obfuscate just about any la…
-
comment
Comment #1412157
Your objections seem to boil down to a superstitious distrust of javascript. The web may be a messy platform, but javascript is not a particularly difficult language to read, and (…
-
comment
Comment #1412135
It's using millisecond precision time for the nonce, yes. Nonce collisions in a normal volume chat are unlikely. If you'd like to suggest improved counter code, however, I'm all ea…
-
comment
Comment #1411859
... and why did you give your chat password to someone who will use it to turn off the crypto? >_>
-
comment
Comment #1411855
Transparently? Without anyone being the wiser? The javascript is there for the auditing. The server-side code is not, but you're completely free to analyze the client-side code to …
-
comment
Comment #1411756
A couple folks have kindly pointed out that it's wide open to to XSS attacks, since it allows full HTML posting. This is 100% true ... and doesn't matter one bit. The only informat…
-
comment
Comment #1411717
That's the point. :) Your password is never sent to the server or stored in any cookies. You have to enter it every time because it only lives in browser memory while you view the …
-
comment
Comment #1411711
Yikes, thanks for pointing this out! I fixed a rendering bug in MobileWebkit and wound up breaking Firefox. It should work now. Gotta love web development.
-
comment
Comment #1411639
For any HN crypto nerds: I made a little web chat that even the server can't read. Besides boring old SSL, bonchat.org uses a javascript implementation of AES to encrypt chat clien…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1085334
What are you basing that on? To gold rush developers, perhaps. I spend most of my iphone time in safari, and I don't think I'm alone. With a bigger screen I'd use it even more. Thi…