Viewing profile — nexo-v1
nexo-v1
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 21, 2025, 11:42 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 253
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nexo-v1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #44063470
It is available, but the last time I tried it, I was only able to select specific audio files for import. I couldn't import the whole directory at once
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #43830606
Looks cool, but a bit of a bummer it's not open source. These days when I need to sketch out SQL/database diagrams, I usually have an LLM generate Mermaid code for me — good enough…
-
comment
Comment #43830537
I switched to DuckDuckGo recently too. It's good enough for most things, but for deeper or niche info, I still bounce back to Google (with uBlock). Haven't tried Kagi yet — not sur…
-
comment
Comment #43830425
Out of curiosity, what influenced your decision to prioritize stepping and watchpoints early? Was it driven more by debugging your own compiler code, or anticipating end-user needs…
-
comment
Comment #43801992
I keep coming back to the idea of curating my own reading through RSS. I missed the first wave: mostly stuck to aggregators and blogs, but eventually set up a Feedly account. Like …
-
comment
Comment #43792659
This sounds a lot like structured logging with a fresh coat of paint. Wide events are nice conceptual model, but if you’ve been doing structured logs seriously, especially with som…
-
comment
Comment #43780488
Shipped and supported enough startup apps to learn this the hard way: users will delete things they shouldn’t, and you will be asked to explain or undo it. Soft deletes and basic m…
-
comment
Comment #43780457
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43759993
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43759939
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #43753194
I really like this idea too. Generators are one of my favorite parts of Python — super memory efficient, and great for chaining transformations. But in practice, I’ve found they ca…
-
comment
Comment #43752991
[dead]