Viewing profile — neuterlize

I wrote five comments (well, it was five at the time) on the NN discussion ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15754287 ) All comments were relevant, on point and upvoted. Then …

> Auction-based prioritization of bandwidth. That's a really, really contrived example. Firstly, it assumes that bandwidth is scarce, which it isn't in the access network. Secondly…

> doesn't allow any paid prioritization, even if such prioritization isn't anti-competitive. Please give an example of paid prioritization that isn't anti-competitive.

Upgrading your infrastructure to meet the demand your customers place on it isn't a cost of regulatory compliance. It's the cost of doing business. Where in the network neutrality …

With what money and what political capital?

Yes, we had NN before 2015. It was the default state and how the Internet was originally built. We used to have competition for Internet services (dialup and DSL), now we don't (mo…

> If we want something for the public good, it should be publically funded. That's just a silly argument. If we are going there, let's first have the ISPs vacate all public rights …

> The planned order hasn't even been released! Be that time it'll probably be too late. > On the one hand, I can see why monopolistic powers in the hands of ISPs would be bad, but …

Your arguments don't make much sense. Network neutrality is not Ma Bell style regulation. NN will not freeze things. Don't know which oligarchs you are referring to, but any NN law…