Viewing profile — nephesh
nephesh
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 02, 2010, 10:30 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nephesh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5578344
I'm sure productivity skyrocketed /s
-
comment
Comment #4518449
> Generics would not make the function signatures shorter. You would have to introduce yet another concept: type inference for the signatures of anonymous functions Yes, I should h…
-
comment
Comment #4518084
> With a more complex type (I don't see how this would affect one more than the other) It does because the discussion is about generics. The fact that you're writing out types for …
-
comment
Comment #4517726
Now try it on a more complex type. Then try and compose various operations. Then swap out the container type.
-
comment
Comment #4516994
With this standard for "essential" you may as well just drop down into assembly language. The only added simplicity here is for the compiler writers, not the end users.
-
comment
Comment #4516302
Yeah, it basically makes the answer to the original question an emphatic "No".
-
comment
Comment #3140305
Not to disagree, but this type of scenario has become much easier to deal with using iframe's and postMessage ( https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.postMessage ). You can b…
-
comment
Comment #2998855
Yup, I even wrote a framework to convert F# to javascript which allowed me to create a new (really powerful) validation provider for MVC. Sadly I haven't had a real world project t…
-
comment
Comment #1567312
As someone who has been learning Haskell recently I think I can bring up a point that no one else has. Record syntax in Haskell sucks. Most business programming revolves around a f…