Viewing profile — necauqua

With what you described it sounds like jj is _literally_ exactly what you need, lol Give it a try, but also know that git branches and _topological_ branches are different things

There's an anti-footgun heuristic that asks "are you sure", basically, if the file about to be tracked is >=1mb, saved a lot of asses a lot of times. But also, if it is such a show…

It's hilarious that there are people who "don't get what problem jj is trying to solve". It seems like they just use git so little, barely for more that linearly committing, so the…

I guess you don't use anything that's not preinstalled on your OS distribution then, lol Jesus, what a hater Maybe one day you'll become self-aware

I guess you could question the specific example, but to me the question sounded like "why would you do rebases". Like, for various reasons?. The point was that it's way easier and …

??.. wdym why, what?. Also this is just an example, there are a lot of very complex (from the point of git) things that are trivial like that in jj. Although if you're asking "why …

It's very obviously miles better because there's no global rebase state?. So you can just leave the conflict there an go work on something else then come back. Also it's not sequen…

You can set `snapshot.auto-track` config to "none()" (which is a fileset, so you could actually have something like src/* there). That way, only files that were already present in …

While I understand your predicament, consider not giving up on jj just yet because of this. It is _exceedingly_ hard to lose files in jj, it's actually emotionally frustrating read…

In git terms (this is an analogy that is a bit wrong, but useful here), doing `jj new` after making some changes is the same as doing `git commit -am ""` then. Would you expect `gi…

It's `jj status`?.

Wow, you really just looked at a screenshot, got mad, and then went to write this shallow hate message. > my bane of "modern" CLI applications Ok boomer, I guess you're also a Rust…