Viewing profile — nealbozeman
nealbozeman
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 09, 2011, 7:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 111
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nealbozeman
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34298694
Well said, and fun example with Chiemgauer. Critical mass/tipping point is the issue, so what is the target audience in the beginning? Ping me if you want some Metrics. Neal@metric…
-
comment
Comment #34298551
Points heard - I've been down this road, too. Contracts & debt can be specified in any currency, including a private one, even if taxes have to be marked to a national currency at …
-
comment
Comment #34298504
Agreed. I don't mention anything about inflation proof. Rather, it should be clarified as a reference to monetary inflation. Inflation happens for many reasons, and even monetary i…
-
comment
Comment #34298475
Agreed! Ping me Neal@metricdc.org if you want some cash. If you're looking at any other ideas in the space, would love to hear about them.
-
comment
Comment #34298465
Thanks for the nice comment! Ping me neal@metricdc.org and I'll leave you some Metrics :) . Anyone else interested, can ping me, too. I'll leave you a "cash" pickup that you take u…
-
comment
Comment #34298319
The taxing is continuous. There is no strategy to wait to pay out.
-
comment
Comment #34298200
Central Banks don't require a nation-state. They can be private. Cryptos and tokens, generally, are decentralized and couldn't be controlled by a central bank. I'm using a private …
-
comment
Comment #34298155
https://metricdc.org
-
comment
Comment #34297982
Yep, this is why it has to be centralized. The Central Bank has to verify identities. You can have accounts that are unverified, or business accounts that are not individuals. They…
-
comment
Comment #34297811
It's a private CBDC, so a private CBDC couldn't collect on property tax. Anyway, I'm considering only dead-simple ways to fund the UBI, which means tapping in to all money across t…
-
comment
Comment #34297803
Thanks, it's okay that the comment order shifts around. It's intended, so the most interesting aspects rise up.
-
comment
Comment #34297540
A successful private currency would be one which was your preferred currency to make a transaction with in the grocery store, over and above euros, dollars, and pesos. Despite the …
-
comment
Comment #34297535
A tax is needed to raise the money for the UBI, and to keep the value and money supply stable. Income tax is unnecessary if you say money that's sitting doing nothing will be taxed…
-
comment
Comment #34297528
For the stable money supply, let's cap it at X-money per person. We want a money supply that grows to accommodate new users of the currency in order to prevent deflation, and a sup…
-
comment
Comment #34297521
For the defuckifier, I chose a UBI, or you can call it a "negative income tax," or a perpetual redistribution. Something devoid of moralistic choice - it's just something everyone …
-
story
I'm lonely, and created a private CBDC
I'm an autodidact, a cynical lover of economics and finance, a software engineer by trade, and a perpetual nomad of 15 years. My CBDC has two features; 1) an automatic economic-def…
-
comment
Comment #25799535
Same as any other crypto that starts off, you can't buy gold. No one will trade. You can use it to trade labor and dig up gold.
-
comment
Comment #25795971
I would love to browse the web with different personas. I want to see what Bill Gates' search results look like, compared to someone else.
-
comment
Comment #25795937
Interesting point how bitcoin is only anonymous up to a point. Thinking about privacy instead is maybe a good angle.
-
comment
Comment #25795774
Really throws out decentralization if you have to verify identity.
- story
- story
-
story
Has this season of Silicon Valley become very formulaic?
Love Mike Judge and his writing. I'd call it, slapstick with nuance. But currently, I'm not finding myself craving the next weeks' new episodes like before. Anyone else feeling lik…
-
comment
Comment #14359930
It's hard in this case not to argue that he owns 33% of the 1.5mm company that the three have built until today. Diluting him out to effectively zero would be cause for criminal ch…
-
comment
Comment #14359679
Investors will not see his 10% ownership as a red flag any more than they will see a non participating investor owning 25% of the business as a red flag. In this case, he/she deliv…