Viewing profile — ndj7
ndj7
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 17, 2014, 7:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ndj7
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16553180
What's the best way to teach modern C++ as a first programming language? I'm at CU Boulder and their curriculum is outdated (90s) and backwards. What resources could I point the pr…
-
comment
Comment #11955880
Looks like https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/njones/imageflow-respec... spurred them into action by offering the same thing, but without the proprietary, permanent lock-in facto…
-
comment
Comment #11930285
Imagine the response were some terrible person to edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi...
-
comment
Comment #11924910
It's clear we can improve our messaging about ways to integrate Imageflow. The command-line tool aspect is under-emphasized, and the libimageflow aspect seems to be confusing as we…
-
comment
Comment #11924758
> but you definitely don't want this public web facing. That's what dynamic imaging is. Your server generates images as needed, at the right size, in the right format. Even Kicksta…
-
comment
Comment #11924716
This is not a hosted service, but rather a reusable library, server, and command-line tool. Backers can already download a prototype of the command-line tool. We don't advertise it…
-
comment
Comment #11924687
Imageflow has two parts - libimageflow, and imageflow-server. Both the library and server offer a JSON API, so it can evolve without breaking changes. Most users leverage the Dynam…
-
comment
Comment #11833183
Actually, the image rendering parts are far less difficult than the codec parts. You need the whole system in an operation graph in order to do the right thing to every image. Also…
-
comment
Comment #11833164
We started Imageflow ( https://www.imageflow.io ) in C to design the C ABI for interop with all the host languages, but we're swapping out components for Rust every time it's possi…
-
comment
Comment #11833127
There's a crucial difference; OpenSSL was designed to be secure. ImageMagick was designed to support hundreds of codecs and thousands of operations. You can't pivot design on 1.25 …
-
comment
Comment #9228084
OSS also empowers individuals to create great things - despite limited financial resources.
-
comment
Comment #8472968
We've been doing this for years; it's built into many on-demand asset pipelines, like ImageResizer: http://imageresizing.net/plugins/faces