Viewing profile — nbsande
nbsande
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 04, 2020, 6:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 80
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About nbsande
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46113821
> With more than 5 million downloads since its launch, the app has helped block more than 3.7 million stolen or lost mobile phones, while more than 30 million fraudulent connection…
-
comment
Comment #44698467
While having the same code for sync and async sounds nice, monkey patching code at runtime seems hacky. Any library that wants to use a lower level implementation of network calls …
-
comment
Comment #41737700
The idea is to map N tasks to M threads. This is useful more than just when you needd more threads than the OS can spin up. As you scale up the number of threads you increase conte…
-
comment
Comment #41737684
Having too many threads all running at the same time can also cause a performance hit, and I don't mean hitting the OS limit on threads. The more threads you have running in parall…
-
comment
Comment #41737644
The use case I wrote it in mind with is FastAPI. In that case, there wouldn't be any change to the Python code. You'd just use a different ASGI server that would use this sort of m…
-
comment
Comment #41737616
Hard agree. If you want resource efficiency and high performance you're probably better off looking to lower level languages most of the time. In my experience FastAPI usually gets…
-
comment
Comment #41685314
Hmmm. That would indeed be better. Seems like an interesting experiment to try and implement virtual threads for python!
-
comment
Comment #41685302
run_in_executor is pretty powerful for running sync code in async code, but my use case was more making async code utlize the cpu better. I think, just using run_in_executor would …
-
story
Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event loop
This project explores the integration of multithreading into the asyncio event loop in Python. While this was initially built with enhancing CPU utilization for FastAPI servers in …
-
comment
Comment #40295691
If I'm understanding your point correctly that wouldn't prevent them from offering higher ram specs for the lower storage eg. 512 gig macs. So it seems like it is just price gougin…
-
comment
Comment #38056806
The large(100k tokens) context window together with the fact that it can actually use the information in that context window. From personal experience other models including open a…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #28208698
That's not strictly true. I'm sure thst GitHub contributed to the awareness of git among and less technically experienced especially in recent years, but use of version control sys…
-
comment
Comment #27062178
Keeping support for near 20 year old consumer grade machines in the kernel seems ridiculous to me. Doing so would bloat the size of the kernel even more than it already is. The mor…