Viewing profile — naveensundar
naveensundar
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 01, 2008, 11:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 314
- Public activity
- 96 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About naveensundar
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45034458
You are missing the point. Almost all animals care about their offspring. There are other animals with sharp claws. But only one animal does this kind of introspective arguing.
-
comment
Comment #45034430
I think this is not a valid criticism. By this criteria, you can then say many other non-psych conditions are not disorders. What classifies as a disorder other than making life wo…
-
comment
Comment #45034409
Logically, your example is not contradictory. 1. We don't know actual prevalence 2. But believe it is low 3. Upper bound in some community is 2% It is not at all contradictory.
-
comment
Comment #44958624
> Eagles see a lot better than we do. Sea sponges live much longer. Dolphins are really good at echolocation; people are generally really bad at it. And yet we keep proclaiming how…
- story
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5094197
Logic is much more than classical AI. The logic culture in classic AI was very ambitious and that was one of the reasons it crashed and not due to fundamental flaws in logic. Forma…
-
comment
Comment #4892026
Can you name one modern rigorous and precise discipline that does not have philosophic roots? We don't know what science today's philosophy might produce in the future.
-
comment
Comment #4891678
Who will decide what has practical consequences?
-
comment
Comment #4749834
The obvious question to ask: Why is that part not shown in the video? Edit: Just watched the video again. The video suspiciously freezes from 11s to 18s. Probably, something inconv…
-
comment
Comment #4749824
Why are those not filmed?
-
comment
Comment #4652218
Why did you leave out what was stated just before and after what you have quoted from the study? You seem to be misrepresenting what they intended to show with those numbers. The p…
-
comment
Comment #4156635
Sanskrit is quite a unique language and is far from being dead. Modern linguistics owes quite a lot to Sanskrit, e.g. Chomsky's famous notation, thematic roles in semantics, contro…
-
comment
Comment #4062129
Why did you leave out Rao's rebuttal to Farmer and friends' unabashed ad-hominmen laced pieces that you have given? Rao's reply in Computational Linguistics: http://www.cs.washingt…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3748456
Yes. You are spot on. I am not able to find readable survey-type articles other than the Wikipedia article on solipsism, but the idea you described is kind of folk-knowledge among …
-
comment
Comment #3748354
Thanks! Look forward to reading it. Your other comment on matter capturing consciousness is interesting and insightful.
-
comment
Comment #3748346
Yes, I have skimmed through it. It is a nicely written book, but I think the main premise is wrong. A more nuanced book is Penrose's Shadows of the Mind . It is more rigorous and h…
-
comment
Comment #3748337
You are right. It is sort of similar to the "other minds" problem. There are no ironclad arguments against a car engine not being conscious, though it seems obvious. You can have m…
-
comment
Comment #3747462
Logically speaking consciousness being "produced" from neurons doesn't any sense whatsoever. It sounds magical. What is it that is being produced? Why is not produced in other dyna…
-
comment
Comment #3106075
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what+is+love%3F
-
comment
Comment #3046468
Smooth delivery is overrated. The pauses convey information about the speaker's state of mind about what he is talking. I usually find that such talks contain much more digestible …
-
comment
Comment #2639770
Well, it is not like they caused genocide or cancer.
-
comment
Comment #2639764
It is okay to break rules once in a while.