Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — n3m4c

n3m4c

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 8:58 PM UTC
HN karma
69
Public activity
14 items

About n3m4c

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41066213

    Everything works if you use User-Agent switcher extension. So they went through the trouble of making an "unsupported" page and redirecting you to that page instead of doing nothin…

  2. comment
    Comment #41033681

    Could they go the tinygrad route and post bounties like "$1000 for fixing this major bug"

  3. comment
    Comment #40974257

    https://archive.ph/RQEyA

  4. comment
    Comment #39940270

    XMedia Recode is pretty good. https://www.xmedia-recode.de/en/index.php

  5. comment
    Comment #38191811

    I like how it doesn't recommend itself but instead recommends "Microsoft's Bard" and "Google's BlenderBot" as alternatives to ChatGPT

  6. comment
    Comment #37014731

    Wouldn’t that mean Intel would really have to negotiate a new deal with whoever buys AMD since otherwise they couldn’t make any new cpus?

  7. comment
    Comment #36657993

    That wasn’t really a merger, more like a renaming

  8. comment
    Comment #36584509

    Reddit has a lot of value, just not people who can utilize it. Anonymous nature of Reddit doesn't matter when you have Meta's cookies while accessing it. Content is also nicely cat…

  9. comment
    Comment #36533924

    Advertisers just aren't running away from Reddit. They were never there in the first place. Reddit's revenue is tiny considering it's userbase. And their data is categorized well, …

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #36444990

    I think I would avoid getting hit by any car if I can

  12. comment
    Comment #36436271

    But people don’t care. Homelab subreddit created a forum and after 5 days, the number of registered users on that forum is 18. Selfhosted subreddit did the same thing and activity …

  13. comment
    Comment #36424873

    https://archive.ph/a8ko9

  14. comment
    Comment #36391245

    DDoS in this case