Viewing profile — mwytock
mwytock
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 22, 2010, 4:12 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 274
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mwytock
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14993028
Thanks for summarizing. I suggest you reread #3 and note the use of language like "suggest", "consistent with" and "perceived". Authors use language like this because its really ha…
-
comment
Comment #14992820
Thanks for the play-by-play! I do disagree about winning/losing. I feel I've done a good job representing my views. I fixed the typo in my statement, sorry for the confusion. As I …
-
comment
Comment #14992327
See citation above. I'm saying its much too strong a claim to go from this paper to the conclusion that women are biologically less inclined to engineering. EDIT: To be consistent …
-
comment
Comment #14992152
You made a blanket statement about discussing offensive things and I wanted to point out there are some limits, especially at the workplace. In this particular case, I feel that le…
-
comment
Comment #14991915
Well, saying things that are clearly wrong and offensive to large numbers of people is typically looked down upon amongst educated people and highly discouraged at the workplace. F…
-
comment
Comment #14991734
Maybe. I don't think Sundar Pichai or Danielle Brown did though, they just said "this is not OK" and "code of conduct". Perhaps they felt they didn't need to engage with this kind …
-
comment
Comment #14991656
I see. Well I'm saying it does not. Obviously we disagree about what the scientific research says.
-
comment
Comment #14991623
I'm not sure what the contradiction is here? Also, I wasn't making any claim about my own feelings, the massive response shows that the memo was highly offensive to many people.
-
comment
Comment #14991595
You're right, my one sentence is just trying to explain the basic point to people who may not get it. Its not trying to lay out a complete thesis in support. I'm not sure if thats …
-
comment
Comment #14991572
I'm not sure what you are arguing, can you be more explicit? You're saying that you agree with the fundamental point of the memo?
-
comment
Comment #14991168
A lot of people on "our side" did a bad job of simply refuting the argument presented. Its straightforward to do in one sentence: "While there may be scientific evidence of differe…
-
comment
Comment #14970506
I agree that the document blurs the line between preference/aptitude and is not totally clear which is one of the reasons overall it is a mess. Nonetheless, many of the statements …
-
comment
Comment #14969780
Well said, it's a massive leap to go from biological gender differences to differences in aptitude for engineering. The gross oversimplified claims from the document that attempt t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #14288151
Many methods in machine learning and statistics benefit from two types of theory: 1) Optimization theory - which says, if I repeat this iterative method N times I will find a (near…
-
comment
Comment #14132091
I see, that's interesting. It does seem to be a tough business, but I guess don't see why it's not "naturally competitive" (as the author claims)
-
comment
Comment #14131954
What about Southwest, JetBlue or Virgin? Or in Europe, RyanAir and EasyJet? It seems there is at least some competition, United is just not a very good airline.
-
comment
Comment #13572662
Wow this guy really needs to take it down a few notches. Yes, PG's articles present a magical fantasy world dominated by the masterful hacker and visionary entrepreneur. They are i…
-
comment
Comment #13115484
Theyre writing long term contracts for power production which provide a fixed price for the resource developers and by consequence provide them with a fixed cost. Typically, these …
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #11555622
The particulars of the interface are really not the point of these exercises
- story