Viewing profile — mvolkmann
mvolkmann
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 03, 2012, 7:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mvolkmann
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35275639
Sorry, I didn't know that.
-
comment
Comment #35268660
This article is a collection of tips on terminal usage.
- story
-
comment
Comment #22538613
Sapper provides a great option for routing. I view that as the official routing solution, but there are other options too.
-
comment
Comment #21385762
It seems like both Mithril and Imba do some form of DOM diffing. It’s easy because you just tell it to update the DOM using the latest state. Imba in particular says it has a reall…
-
comment
Comment #21383551
@pier25 You got me curious about this. I've never seen this done with Svelte, so I decided to try it. Check this out: https://github.com/mvolkmann/svelte-with-classes/blob/master..…
-
comment
Comment #21381118
You can do complicated things with Svelte stores, but in my experience most of the time you only need something like this using a writable store: import {writable} from 'svelte/sto…
-
comment
Comment #21381004
I haven't tried that.
-
comment
Comment #21379928
I absolutely love Svelte ... and Sapper too! Here's a talk I gave recently on Svelte. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXOE7oZyaBA
-
comment
Comment #21379910
Testing for Svelte does exist! See my writeup on it here: https://objectcomputing.com/resources/publications/sett/july...
-
comment
Comment #21379894
I understand if you really want TypeScript support, but why do you feel the component model is hacky? I find it beautifully simple.
-
comment
Comment #21379885
The testing story just hasn't been well documented yet in the official docs. I have documented both unit and end-to-end testing with Svelte here: https://objectcomputing.com/resour…
-
comment
Comment #21379859
Yes, but it is so much easier to implement Svelte components than components in Angular, React, or Vue. So much less code to write. No need to write classes, just plain functions, …
-
comment
Comment #21379834
A Svelte store can hold a deeply nested object. It's up to you how fine-grained you want the stores to be, anywhere from one store per value to one store for the entire application…
-
comment
Comment #21093589
HTML/CSS/JavaScript has no builtin state management and no two-way binding between state and form controls. Svelte makes those things very easy.
-
comment
Comment #21093574
If you are referring to my article, "small footprint" is not the main point for me. The main point is ease development due to features like easier component state management, app s…
-
comment
Comment #21093515
You said "My personal view is that the 'what' in frontend development generally isn't super interesting and most web frontends are very similar." I think if you take a serious look…
-
comment
Comment #21093485
If your most pressing issue is making managing state easier, you should run to Svelte! Take a look at how Svelte supports "stores", "context", and state within a component. Those a…
-
comment
Comment #21093469
Here is the issue that describes what the Svelte team is doing to add support for TypeScript: https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/issues/1639
-
comment
Comment #21093452
Not true. That section mentions several other "Whys" including this: "Svelte dramatically simplifies component and application state management. Contributing features include conte…
-
comment
Comment #20363614
If you want to get up to speed on Svelte quickly, read this! https://objectcomputing.com/resources/publications/sett/july...
-
comment
Comment #17552082
If you like templates and framework-specific syntax for conditional logic and iteration sprinkled into your HTML then you will love Vue. If you prefer the JSX approach and relying …