Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — mutex007

mutex007

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 21, 2013, 2:43 PM UTC
HN karma
6
Public activity
16 items

About mutex007

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #26063471

    NodeChef. https://www.nodechef.com/ - Supports all Cloud Foundry and Heroku build packs.

  2. comment
    Comment #12162500

    I am curious how an inverted index will be implemented efficiently atop an LSM tree. Maybe batch parts of the posting list under a numeric key and when performing an intersection o…

  3. story
  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #7592852

    elastic search will score no more than 7 points on our feature table. We are very aware of their product and currently running benchmarks on it. If you are interested, i can person…

  6. comment
    Comment #7592821

    we picked the most popular out of the RDBMS, NOSQL and newSQL world. In the future we will compare against more systems. We are actually in the process of releasing benchmarks as w…

  7. comment
    Comment #7555382

    $700 annually. Please read well before you misrepresent us. By the way Partitioning by Hash and Range as we have stated means "Sharding"

  8. comment
    Comment #7555269

    The price is unbelievably fair. Try deploying mysql in the cloud and while you are at it, you get Redis as well for cache and then you hit the wall you need search in your applicat…

  9. comment
    Comment #7553717

    In the case of MongoDB, dump a blob called BSON which itself can be larger than the JSON itself. Paradoxically this is touted as a space efficient binary serialization you then rea…

  10. comment
    Comment #7553589

    By the way if you are looking for all the above functionality provided by all the DBMS you mentioned in a single DBMS instance, you can check out amisaserver.com. Polygot persisten…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #7553348

    Sounds good to me. Might try it out.

  13. comment
    Comment #6918430

    Assuming your 70ms in transit is accurate, although you have not provided details on how you measured that. 20ms svr processing time is only 50 inserts per second which is simply u…

  14. comment
    Comment #6918334

    Assuming a tcp connection can be established in 15ms worst case and another 10ms for data transmission, 65ms spent by the dbms for a single insert is incredibly slow. I am very awa…

  15. comment
    Comment #6918107

    Just curious, how many indexes were on the structure you were inserting? Also, i am assuming 90ms per structure, if that is correct, then that is equal to 11 inserts per second whi…

  16. comment
    Comment #6804847

    Shameful self promotion. However i have to say the SQL and your type system makes me gravitate towards your platform. Can Kill mongoCache for sure