Viewing profile — murkt
murkt
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 07, 2008, 8:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,304
- Public activity
- 260 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About murkt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49034001
Yeah, along with UPPERCASE labels, which is a staple of AI designed pages
-
comment
Comment #48857246
It triggered for me on a completely pedestrian game design prompt a couple of days ago. I’ve sent feedback and continued with Opus, but that was really unexpected
-
comment
Comment #48850230
I remember similar kind of visualization from a decade ago, called paperscape. Looked cool, worked on clustering using citations and references. Never got any idea on any use case …
-
comment
Comment #48812181
This supports my feelings of what works best when working with the models. Especially together with the directional bias in recall that’s mentioned here in the comments. First, the…
-
comment
Comment #48640954
Some problems are very hard to solve with stupid code. This can easily be the case (computational geometry)
-
comment
Comment #48606577
I am having a hard time picturing what could be the problem that you were solving. Redis, Cassandra, RabbitMQ and Clickhouse. RabbitMQ looks like a black sheep in this lineup.
-
comment
Comment #48595791
Yeah, probably different halves of the book. I've read it a few years ago, and it looks like I've just ignored/forgot all that "bending reality" stuff. It's not my cup of tea, so I…
-
comment
Comment #48574598
Opus 4.5-4.7 was pretty bad at it, 4.8 was a bit better, and I have not tried Fable much. So basically you have a good enough code that’s “intuitive” for a model, screenshots, and …
-
comment
Comment #48574367
I find all current LLMs to have pretty poor spatial awareness. It is becoming better, but still very poor. How are you dealing with that? Got any special tricks, any advice?
-
comment
Comment #48574231
Touching shoulders and shaking hands palm-down is “persuasion” bullshit. Can’t say anything about other books, but Never Split the Difference is about hearing and understanding oth…
-
comment
Comment #48566954
Please read the actual book, it’s kind of the opposite from manipulation. You can read more detailed answers in the near branch of comments.
-
comment
Comment #48566648
I’ve genuinely read only Never Split the Difference from your list, and it’s kind of the opposite from manipulation. The book teaches how to actually hear people even in the very e…
-
comment
Comment #48565609
“Never Split the Difference”, which is a book about how to successfully communicate with terrorists. Very suitable for talking with kids! I’ve even read aloud a few chapters to my …
-
comment
Comment #48534001
The post matches my experience as well, I am asking a question like “does A work like this and that”, and Claude responds with “you’re conflating A and B! Only A does this and that…
-
comment
Comment #48408584
Ah, okay, my bad. Got too focused on the name. Googled the dates, Satya became CEO in 2014 and Sundar became CEO in 2015, so it’s actually not that different, especially when we lo…
-
comment
Comment #48408406
Sundar Pichai does not work in Microsoft, though. A bit weird to anchor the MS timeline on his position. When he became the CEO, actually? I don’t remember the year even approximat…
-
comment
Comment #48314755
Price hasn’t changes at all, though.
-
comment
Comment #48113615
Can this be a Siri-like core? Set me a timer, tell me what’s the weather, etc. Here is transcribed text and available list of tools for the model to call, and voice the output.
-
comment
Comment #48108327
The last one is about involving less people. You don't have to read it as "shut up and keep your thoughts for yourself". I read it more like "Do we really need to have six people w…
-
comment
Comment #48108300
You can make the feature with one colleague, or you can call in five more people to weigh in and do their parts of the work. If you involve five more, the result could be better in…
-
comment
Comment #48046706
What I meant is that only sometimes I am faster than Claude with debugging. When it's a standalone problem, a report in Sentry, and I just know immediately where I need to go to fi…
-
comment
Comment #48045938
Sometimes debuggind is faster indeed, and making small very focused changes too. But during feature development? Not possible. And I consider myself a very fast developer
-
comment
Comment #47983160
A fee years ago, I woke up in the middle of the night with a very cool sounding riff playing in my head for a song that I was thinking about at that time. I am not a musician and t…
-
comment
Comment #47944145
Azure is worse. These series of posts were posted here not that long ago https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporize...
-
comment
Comment #47923523
Autonomous Thriving Hroup?