Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — muneeb

muneeb

HN member
Joined
Tue, Nov 20, 2007, 12:37 PM UTC
HN karma
832
Public activity
178 items

About muneeb

Co-founder Stacks (YC S14), a Bitcoin L2. Interested in distributed systems and blockchains. Bitcoin class of 2013.

Twitter: @muneeb

Web: http://muneeb.com

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #25786983

    I'd argue the inverse. It's easier to build more complex things on top of simpler primitives than vice versa. So a simpler base layer (say TCP/IP for the internet) opens the doors …

  3. comment
    Comment #25786943

    Ethereum 2 is very different. It is proof of stake (PoS). This reuses the proof of work of Bitcoin (so very different properties for how hard it is to change blockchain history). A…

  4. comment
    Comment #25786910

    What you are describing is similar to what Stacks 1.0 was i.e., directly on top of the Bitcoin chain -- a virtualchain. Every Stacks 1.0 transaction was a Bitcoin transaction. The …

  5. comment
    Comment #25786026

    The design can be thought of similar to a side chain but it's not really a side chain. It uses a new type of consensus, called Proof of Transfer (PoX). Stacks miners have visibilit…

  6. comment
    Comment #25785983

    Muneeb here, Stacks co-founder. So it does not use Bitcoin as oracle. It uses Bitcoin as a settlement layer. (Oracles like Chainlink can be, and are being, built using Clarity lang…

  7. comment
    Comment #25783308

    Good question! Bitcoin has limited scripting language (Bitcoin script) for security reasons. Having a general smart contract language could open up a larger attack surface area for…

  8. comment
    Comment #25783277

    The Clarity smart contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin state and developers can write logic around it. I do not think the headline implies you are changing Bitcoin to do t…

  9. comment
    Comment #25782824

    99% of Bitcoin remains passively outside of smart contracts. Only about 5B on Ethereum. This can be a fairly large market and we're in early days. More use cases don't need to take…

  10. comment
    Comment #25782678

    We received some push back for Stacks 1.0 as well! And for similar reasons i.e., you don't want to put a lot of additional data into the Bitcoin blockchain (makes it much harder to…

  11. comment
    Comment #25782563

    The smart contracts part comes with Clarity lang: https://clarity-lang.org/ Clarity contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin state and can write logic against that.

  12. comment
    Comment #25782541

    Muneeb here, Stacks co-founder. Great question. You are right that Clarity smart contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin, so you can write a contract that has logic triggered…

  13. story
  14. story
  15. story
  16. story
  17. story
  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #22695795

    Can decentralized (i.e., user owned) storage help here? Instead of keeping data only at user device, it can be backed up in an encrypted and private way. Gaia is one example: https…

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #20671002

    See reply above. Thanks,

  22. comment
    Comment #20670997

    The pay outs are in Stacks (STX) tokens. Only the pilot phase was in USD/BTC which came from a developer growth/marketing budget that Blockstack PBC funded. See this post for detai…

  23. comment
    Comment #20655084

    The point is global coordination without going through a big company like Facebook. Take the Dmails app for example, you can email me there on muneeb.id -- this will not be possibl…

  24. comment
    Comment #20648997

    Muneeb from Blockstack here. The Stacks blockchain is needed to anchor user identities in a system that is not controlled by any single company. The App Mining rewards are incentiv…

  25. story