Viewing profile — muneeb
muneeb
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 20, 2007, 12:37 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 832
- Public activity
- 178 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About muneeb
Twitter: @muneeb
Web: http://muneeb.com
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #25786983
I'd argue the inverse. It's easier to build more complex things on top of simpler primitives than vice versa. So a simpler base layer (say TCP/IP for the internet) opens the doors …
-
comment
Comment #25786943
Ethereum 2 is very different. It is proof of stake (PoS). This reuses the proof of work of Bitcoin (so very different properties for how hard it is to change blockchain history). A…
-
comment
Comment #25786910
What you are describing is similar to what Stacks 1.0 was i.e., directly on top of the Bitcoin chain -- a virtualchain. Every Stacks 1.0 transaction was a Bitcoin transaction. The …
-
comment
Comment #25786026
The design can be thought of similar to a side chain but it's not really a side chain. It uses a new type of consensus, called Proof of Transfer (PoX). Stacks miners have visibilit…
-
comment
Comment #25785983
Muneeb here, Stacks co-founder. So it does not use Bitcoin as oracle. It uses Bitcoin as a settlement layer. (Oracles like Chainlink can be, and are being, built using Clarity lang…
-
comment
Comment #25783308
Good question! Bitcoin has limited scripting language (Bitcoin script) for security reasons. Having a general smart contract language could open up a larger attack surface area for…
-
comment
Comment #25783277
The Clarity smart contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin state and developers can write logic around it. I do not think the headline implies you are changing Bitcoin to do t…
-
comment
Comment #25782824
99% of Bitcoin remains passively outside of smart contracts. Only about 5B on Ethereum. This can be a fairly large market and we're in early days. More use cases don't need to take…
-
comment
Comment #25782678
We received some push back for Stacks 1.0 as well! And for similar reasons i.e., you don't want to put a lot of additional data into the Bitcoin blockchain (makes it much harder to…
-
comment
Comment #25782563
The smart contracts part comes with Clarity lang: https://clarity-lang.org/ Clarity contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin state and can write logic against that.
-
comment
Comment #25782541
Muneeb here, Stacks co-founder. Great question. You are right that Clarity smart contracts have direct visibility into Bitcoin, so you can write a contract that has logic triggered…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #22695795
Can decentralized (i.e., user owned) storage help here? Instead of keeping data only at user device, it can be backed up in an encrypted and private way. Gaia is one example: https…
- story
-
comment
Comment #20671002
See reply above. Thanks,
-
comment
Comment #20670997
The pay outs are in Stacks (STX) tokens. Only the pilot phase was in USD/BTC which came from a developer growth/marketing budget that Blockstack PBC funded. See this post for detai…
-
comment
Comment #20655084
The point is global coordination without going through a big company like Facebook. Take the Dmails app for example, you can email me there on muneeb.id -- this will not be possibl…
-
comment
Comment #20648997
Muneeb from Blockstack here. The Stacks blockchain is needed to anchor user identities in a system that is not controlled by any single company. The App Mining rewards are incentiv…
- story