Viewing profile — mulmen
mulmen
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 17, 2015, 8:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 14,690
- Public activity
- 8,701 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About mulmen
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49204214
> [...] but we need [...] You did the same thing you criticize the author for doing.
-
comment
Comment #49203827
How are you still not getting this? The change is not about owning radio towers. It allows ownership of the programming , including local news production. This is a move for centra…
-
comment
Comment #49201260
This isn't about content delivery, it is about content creation. The rule change allows further centralization of editorial control of what your local reporters broadcast across al…
-
comment
Comment #49201246
They replace it for delivery. That's not what this is about. The change discussed here is about content creation. That content is already delivered through multiple channels.
-
comment
Comment #49201206
This analysis doesn't pass the sniff test. The presence of cable, satellite, or internet access says nothing about broadcast TV viewership. This is ownership of the content creatio…
-
comment
Comment #49201126
And you believe everyone is just like you? What are the consequences of consolidating ownership of broadcast stations? Remember the Kimmel incident? How does that go with even more…
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48955761
Not everything is an LLM boogeyman. Sometimes a bug is just a bug.
- story
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48915346
In my hometown in Idaho in the 1990s and 2000s yes, this includes access roads and improvements to the surrounding area. A car dealership and Wal Mart both paid for road improvemen…
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48879271
In accordance with his will they will fund his “passion projects”. His list of favorites is probably different than yours. Being disappointed about that is not new.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48879200
But the return on that subsidy is positive so why not do it?